Mountain West Conference meeting

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

msuhunter
Member # Retired
Posts: 2534
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 2:36 pm
Location: Bozeman

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by msuhunter » Wed Jan 21, 2026 8:15 pm

The problem is the Montana schools, as dictated by the BOR, are joined at the hip. In reality, um is dragging MSU down. um enrollment is suffering, and they have really poor academics compared to the MW schools. They are holding MSU back.



91catAlum
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10509
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:41 pm
Location: Clancy, MT

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by 91catAlum » Wed Jan 21, 2026 8:22 pm

lutecat wrote:
Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:31 pm
Colter_Nuanez wrote:
Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:04 pm
You are who you hang out with. We've already reached the point for Montana State and Montana that it is almost a complete detriment to be in the Big Sky with many of the members of the conference.
So question for you if you want to answer it.

On your show, Ryan Tootell said he was giving ot 60/40 the griz beat Illinois State. I think it was Ty Gregorak? Thinks that The griz get manhandled. Your thoughts? I mean given how the Bobcats didn’t win the lines definitely and it could be argued the 2nd half the lines were not controlled by the Cats at all, I would argue the griz probably woulsve been rolled.
It was Colter's brother who said the griz would've gotten rolled by ISU.
If Tootell thinks the griz O line or front 6 hold up against ISU, I'd like to try whatever it is he's smoking.


Image

PHAT CAT
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1550
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 3:04 pm

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by PHAT CAT » Wed Jan 21, 2026 8:31 pm

91catAlum wrote:
Wed Jan 21, 2026 8:22 pm
lutecat wrote:
Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:31 pm
Colter_Nuanez wrote:
Fri Jan 16, 2026 6:04 pm
You are who you hang out with. We've already reached the point for Montana State and Montana that it is almost a complete detriment to be in the Big Sky with many of the members of the conference.
So question for you if you want to answer it.

On your show, Ryan Tootell said he was giving ot 60/40 the griz beat Illinois State. I think it was Ty Gregorak? Thinks that The griz get manhandled. Your thoughts? I mean given how the Bobcats didn’t win the lines definitely and it could be argued the 2nd half the lines were not controlled by the Cats at all, I would argue the griz probably woulsve been rolled.
It was Colter's brother who said the griz would've gotten rolled by ISU.
If Tootell thinks the griz O line or front 6 hold up against ISU, I'd like to try whatever it is he's smoking.
Knock, knock. Who's there? "Dave." Dave's not here.



Utcatsfan
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 152
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2022 5:08 pm

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by Utcatsfan » Wed Jan 21, 2026 9:09 pm

msuhunter wrote:
Wed Jan 21, 2026 8:15 pm
The problem is the Montana schools, as dictated by the BOR, are joined at the hip. In reality, um is dragging MSU down. um enrollment is suffering, and they have really poor academics compared to the MW schools. They are holding MSU back.
When UM was offered to move up to the WAC back in 2010 they refused because they didn't want to leave us behind. Personally I'd want us to stick together, the TV numbers for our playoff game showed we can provide a good product for Media.



User avatar
catgrad05
Member # Retired
Posts: 2517
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:51 am
Location: North Central Montna

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by catgrad05 » Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:04 pm

CalgaryCat wrote:
Wed Jan 21, 2026 6:48 pm


Not on Xitter, but I saw this post on egris and it made me wonder. I feel like SOMEONE on here would have heard something if it was happening, but you never know.
I’m willing to bet this is just a ploy to get more views and the new member bit is discussing the ones already announced in more depth



User avatar
Montanabob
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4782
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:29 pm
Location: Two Dot

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by Montanabob » Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:51 pm

catgrad05 wrote:
Wed Jan 21, 2026 10:04 pm
CalgaryCat wrote:
Wed Jan 21, 2026 6:48 pm


Not on Xitter, but I saw this post on egris and it made me wonder. I feel like SOMEONE on here would have heard something if it was happening, but you never know.
I’m willing to bet this is just a ploy to get more views and the new member bit is discussing the ones already announced in more depth
On thing pointed out some was 31 mar 26 as the latest date for what ever teams were involved to avoid conference departure fees for play in 2027.


MSU fan.... U of I Graduate... They're Back

St George
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1467
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:46 pm

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by St George » Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:17 am

Anyone that watched or attended either the Super Brawl or the National Championship in Nashville should not want to move up to the FBS. Oh boy get a 50-50 season and an invite to play in the Potato Bowl or the Cricket Bowl in Provo Utah, the Fracking Bowl in Fargo or the Hooker Bowl in Reno. Ok the Hooker Bowl might be fun.

PS: If any conference wants MSU to move up, they should be the ones to pay for all costs, including labeling the field, etc.
Last edited by St George on Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:20 am, edited 1 time in total.



thisnamesucks
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:42 pm

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by thisnamesucks » Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:20 am

There’s no guarantee after the major realignment that is coming early 2030s that the remaining G5 teams don’t adapt a playoff for their division



User avatar
CalgaryCat
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 333
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2021 4:37 pm

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by CalgaryCat » Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:49 am

thisnamesucks wrote:
Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:20 am
There’s no guarantee after the major realignment that is coming early 2030s that the remaining G5 teams don’t adapt a playoff for their division
I’d say it’s almost a guarantee. There’s not going to be sponsor money for a G6 bowl system



thisnamesucks
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 118
Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 2:42 pm

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by thisnamesucks » Thu Jan 22, 2026 11:16 am

CalgaryCat wrote:
Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:49 am
thisnamesucks wrote:
Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:20 am
There’s no guarantee after the major realignment that is coming early 2030s that the remaining G5 teams don’t adapt a playoff for their division
I’d say it’s almost a guarantee. There’s not going to be sponsor money for a G6 bowl system
That’s what I was intending to say, my double negative post didn’t help



ADOKmt
BobcatNation Redshirt
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 2:56 am

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by ADOKmt » Thu Jan 22, 2026 8:11 pm

Saw this on X. We aren't even close to being in the same financial world as these teams, unfortunately. We would need to double our AD budget to make the bottom of this list.

Image


Gus

User avatar
Montanabob
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4782
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:29 pm
Location: Two Dot

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by Montanabob » Thu Jan 22, 2026 8:34 pm

ADOKmt wrote:
Thu Jan 22, 2026 8:11 pm
Saw this on X. We aren't even close to being in the same financial world as these teams, unfortunately. We would need to double our AD budget to make the bottom of this list.

Image
First off. The top folks are not MW.
And it has nothing to do with what the mid to lower MW are spending which is EXACTLTY what the Montana schools are spending.


MSU fan.... U of I Graduate... They're Back

ADOKmt
BobcatNation Redshirt
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2017 2:56 am

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by ADOKmt » Thu Jan 22, 2026 10:27 pm

Just a point of reference. I know I think that we would step into the MWC and immediately compete, at least in football. But knowing that programs like Texas State and Utah State are double our budget and getting the results they have is worth noting.


Gus

User avatar
84CatGrad
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1668
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 9:05 pm
Location: Columbus, MT

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by 84CatGrad » Fri Jan 23, 2026 10:43 am

damnyoutuesday wrote:
Thu Jan 15, 2026 3:26 pm
I am once again very against moving up to the current FBS climate. Big fish in a small pond beats playing in the goddamn Idaho Potato Bowl as the best possible ending to our season
=D^



User avatar
Hell's Bells
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4707
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:58 pm
Location: Belgrade, Mt.
Contact:

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by Hell's Bells » Fri Jan 23, 2026 11:48 am

84CatGrad wrote:
Fri Jan 23, 2026 10:43 am
damnyoutuesday wrote:
Thu Jan 15, 2026 3:26 pm
I am once again very against moving up to the current FBS climate. Big fish in a small pond beats playing in the goddamn Idaho Potato Bowl as the best possible ending to our season
=D^
Exactly. We would be the "also-rans" of the FBS during the best years
To have the run that Boise had during 2005 to around what...2012...is rare


This space for rent....

MSU01
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:21 pm

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by MSU01 » Fri Jan 23, 2026 11:54 am

Big Sky/FCS: Mostly unexciting regular season, fun and compelling postseason
Mountain West/FBS: Fun and compelling regular season, mostly unexciting postseason


35-34

User avatar
technoCat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4922
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:06 pm
Location: Bozeman

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by technoCat » Fri Jan 23, 2026 12:38 pm

MSU01 wrote:
Fri Jan 23, 2026 11:54 am
Big Sky/FCS: Mostly unexciting regular season, fun and compelling postseason
Mountain West/FBS: Fun and compelling regular season, mostly unexciting postseason
Why would I care any more about playing New Mexico State than NAU?


DIE HARD CATS FAN SINCE THE DAY I WAS BORN

Prodigal Cat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2748
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 9:50 am

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by Prodigal Cat » Fri Jan 23, 2026 1:39 pm

technoCat wrote:
Fri Jan 23, 2026 12:38 pm
MSU01 wrote:
Fri Jan 23, 2026 11:54 am
Big Sky/FCS: Mostly unexciting regular season, fun and compelling postseason
Mountain West/FBS: Fun and compelling regular season, mostly unexciting postseason
Why would I care any more about playing New Mexico State than NAU?
New Mexico State is not in the Mountain West. University of New Mexico is and they were probably on par with the Cats last season. Would have been a fun matchup. If the Cats joined the MWC they would have several more competitive games on the schedule than the 2-3 they will have next season prior to the playoffs. 9 to 10 of the Cat games next year the winning team will not be in doubt… at all. 3/4 of the Big Sky is not good to just flat out bad right now.


Brewer/Owner Copper Furrow Brewing

MSU01
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10913
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:21 pm

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by MSU01 » Fri Jan 23, 2026 2:04 pm

technoCat wrote:
Fri Jan 23, 2026 12:38 pm
MSU01 wrote:
Fri Jan 23, 2026 11:54 am
Big Sky/FCS: Mostly unexciting regular season, fun and compelling postseason
Mountain West/FBS: Fun and compelling regular season, mostly unexciting postseason
Why would I care any more about playing New Mexico State than NAU?
That's one example using a team that isn't even in the Mountain West. I find it hard to believe that anyone could argue the point that MSU wouldn't have a more interesting and competitive regular season schedule at the FBS level than it currently does in the FCS and Big Sky when 2/3 or more of its games are over at halftime. I'm not trying to argue that MSU should or shouldn't move up if they get invited, but a full look at the pros and cons of moving should take into account more than simply the tired argument about not wanting to play in crappy bowl games.


35-34

User avatar
BlueAndGoldNation
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 216
Joined: Tue May 10, 2022 11:23 am
Location: Great Falls, Montana
Contact:

Re: Mountain West Conference meeting

Post by BlueAndGoldNation » Fri Jan 23, 2026 2:04 pm

technoCat wrote:
Fri Jan 23, 2026 12:38 pm
MSU01 wrote:
Fri Jan 23, 2026 11:54 am
Big Sky/FCS: Mostly unexciting regular season, fun and compelling postseason
Mountain West/FBS: Fun and compelling regular season, mostly unexciting postseason
Why would I care any more about playing New Mexico State than NAU?
Having core regional rivalry games against Montana, NDSU, Wyoming, and Nevada every year sounds kind of cool. The out of conference games we could get would also be interesting. When was the last time we played Boise State at home? What about WSU? I think we could schedule a home and away with teams of that caliber. A Boise State Gold Rush would go so unbelievably crazy compared to... Butler? McNeese? Maine? SDSU was a rare case where we had a good home opener.

I know we play Montana and NDSU (almost) every year anyways, but what if NDSU moves up and leaves us here? We would likely be the new king of the FCS, and perhaps be labeled as the "New NDSU" who everyone hates and tells to move up. I like the idea of that too. To win 8 titles in 10 years sounds like a lot of fun, but most of the time that means there is nothing left to prove, and it's time to move on to a new challenge to push the program even further.

My perfect scenario is we win at least 2 of the next 3 titles, then time it perfectly to join the MWC when the realignment happens around 2030. We would leave our FCS era while sitting on the top of the mountain, and enter a new, healthier FBS landscape where there are separate Power 4 and Group of 5 playoffs, transfer regulations etc... Think of the G5 as the "New FCS", and I do believe us getting to the G5 playoffs would be a lot easier to achieve than the current CFP...

Does that scenario change anything for you guys? I'm fine either way, but this moving up thing looks to be more inevitable with each passing day. Mythical "Big Gift", stadium expansions, athletic facility upgrades, the growth of Bozeman, student enrollment records broken every year... It all seems to be pointing to one thing. Our goal is to compete at the highest level possible. I trust in Costello to do what's best for the program.



Post Reply