No Happy Holidays, Part II
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 12:44 pm
No Happy Holidays, Part II
http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/
Happy Holidays, Merry Christmas....Bring 'em On, Bring 'em Home
Yes, I understand that not everyone agrees, but my contention is that they'd be happier back in the USA with their families than fighting this senseless -- in my opinion -- war.
Support Our Troops by Bringing Them Home
Happy Holidays, Merry Christmas....Bring 'em On, Bring 'em Home
Yes, I understand that not everyone agrees, but my contention is that they'd be happier back in the USA with their families than fighting this senseless -- in my opinion -- war.
Support Our Troops by Bringing Them Home
- SonomaCat
- Moderator
- Posts: 23960
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
- Location: Sonoma County, CA
- Contact:
Re: No Happy Holidays, Part II
We can't bring them home until we finish the job that has been started. Iraq must be stable and must have the ability to operate as a sovereign nation. To pull out now would be the worst possible answer both from a moral and from a responsibility point of view. At very least, we have to abide by the Crate and Barrel policy.iaafan wrote:http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/
Happy Holidays, Merry Christmas....Bring 'em On, Bring 'em Home
Yes, I understand that not everyone agrees, but my contention is that they'd be happier back in the USA with their families than fighting this senseless -- in my opinion -- war.
Support Our Troops by Bringing Them Home
- kmax
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9567
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:23 pm
- Location: Belgrade, MT
- Contact:
Re: No Happy Holidays, Part II
I may not agree with alot of the things you say BAC, but this is most definately one of the times I whole heartedly agree. I makes me so mad when people scream to get our troops out of there right now. I am sorry, I hate having our men and women die as much as anyone, and whether or not we should have gone into Iraq in the first place can be debated until you are blue in the face but the fact is we did go in there. To pull out now with Iraq in the broken down state it is in would be worse than anything we did to break it down in the first place.Bay Area Cat wrote:We can't bring them home until we finish the job that has been started. Iraq must be stable and must have the ability to operate as a sovereign nation. To pull out now would be the worst possible answer both from a moral and from a responsibility point of view. At very least, we have to abide by the Crate and Barrel policy.iaafan wrote:http://www.bringthemhomenow.org/
Happy Holidays, Merry Christmas....Bring 'em On, Bring 'em Home
Yes, I understand that not everyone agrees, but my contention is that they'd be happier back in the USA with their families than fighting this senseless -- in my opinion -- war.
Support Our Troops by Bringing Them Home
“Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be—or to be indistinguishable from—self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.” -- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 12:44 pm
That's the part that sucks and what makes it a 'no-win' situation, imo. Morale is coming into play more every day, which means it will take even longer to get our men/boys and women/girls back home. But it's going to be hard to keep morale up when the troops are second-guessing whether or not they are getting the 'real' support they need. Not just magnetic car adornments.
Yes, they have to keep fighting, because we as a country were duped by our leaders into believing it was worthwhile to attack Iraq. It is heartbreaking to think of the families of those who lost loved ones or saw loved ones suffer life-altering injuries (mental and physical). We all owe them a big apology as far as I'm concerned. What a big waste this has been.
What happened today (rockets in the mess hall) kind of puts the Merry Xmas...Happy Holidays argument in the tank for a few years. Doesn't it?
Yes, they have to keep fighting, because we as a country were duped by our leaders into believing it was worthwhile to attack Iraq. It is heartbreaking to think of the families of those who lost loved ones or saw loved ones suffer life-altering injuries (mental and physical). We all owe them a big apology as far as I'm concerned. What a big waste this has been.
What happened today (rockets in the mess hall) kind of puts the Merry Xmas...Happy Holidays argument in the tank for a few years. Doesn't it?
- SonomaCat
- Moderator
- Posts: 23960
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
- Location: Sonoma County, CA
- Contact:
Incidentally, the City/County of SF had a measure on the ballot in November issuing a proclamation (or some other means of emoting that is meaningless from a practical standpoint) demanding that we withdraw our troops from Iraq immediately. I'm pretty sure it passed overwhelmingly, although I can't imagine anyone actually sitting down and coming to the conclusion that it would really be a good idea or the right move at this juncture.
But, it must have given at least a few people a warm fuzzy, because somebody voted for it (I'll go on record saying that I voted against it).
But, it must have given at least a few people a warm fuzzy, because somebody voted for it (I'll go on record saying that I voted against it).
- Beaker
- BobcatNation Redshirt
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 11:57 pm
We serve because we want to. I don't enjoy being apart from my family, but it is the life i've chosen.A Soldier's Christmas
'Twas the night before Christmas, he lived all alone,
In a one bedroom house made of plaster and stone.
I had come down the chimney with presents to give,
And to see just who in this home did live.
I looked all about, a strange sight I did see,
No tinsel, no presents, not even a tree.
No stocking by mantle, just boots filled with sand,
On the wall hung pictures of far distant lands.
With medals and badges, awards of all kinds,
A sober thought came through my mind.
For this house was different, it was dark and dreary,
I found the home of a soldier, once I could see clearly.
The soldier lay sleeping, silent, alone,
Curled up on the floor in this one bedroom home.
The face was so gentle, the room in such disorder,
Not how I pictured a united states soldier.
Was this the hero of whom I'd just read?
Curled up on a poncho, the floor for a bed?
I realized the families that I saw this night,
Owed their lives to these soldiers who were willing to fight.
Soon round the world, the children would play,
And grownups would celebrate a bright Christmas day.
They all enjoyed freedom each month of the year,
Because of the soldiers, like the one lying here.
I couldn't help wonder how many lay alone,
On a cold Christmas eve in a land far from home.
The very thought brought a tear to my eye,
I dropped to my knees and started to cry.
The soldier awakened and I heard a rough voice,
"Santa don't cry, this life is my choice;
I fight for freedom, I don't ask for more,
My life is my God, my country, my Corps."
The soldier rolled over and drifted to sleep,
I couldn't control it, I continued to weep.
I kept watch for hours, so silent and still
And we both shivered from the cold night's chill.
I didn't want to leave on that cold, dark, night,
This guardian of honor so willing to fight.
Then the soldier rolled over,
With a voice soft and pure,
Whispered, "Carry on Santa,
It's Christmas day, all is secure."
One look at my watch, and I knew he was right,
Merry Christmas my friend, and to all a good night.
BAC and kmax: Thanks.
Is your statement based on fact, or assumption? Ask any troops in the AOR and you'll get a different answer than you'd expect.But it's going to be hard to keep morale up when the troops are second-guessing whether or not they are getting the 'real' support they need.
Hamburgers! The cornerstone of any nutritious breakfast.
- BozoneCat
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:15 pm
- Location: Boise, ID
Beaker~
Let me just say a few things:
A heart-felt "Thank You" for your selfless choice to serve our country.
A wish for your safety and god-speed for your return.
And a "Merry Christmas" and "God bless" for yourself and all the troops in harm's way.
We will miss all those that are not able to be here with family for the holidays, but we know they are better men and women than we are, and know that their sacrifice is working to help make this world a better place. I hope everyone is keeping these people in their prayers, especially during a time of year that undoubtedly makes it tougher to concentrate on the job at hand. I know I am.
Let me just say a few things:
A heart-felt "Thank You" for your selfless choice to serve our country.
A wish for your safety and god-speed for your return.
And a "Merry Christmas" and "God bless" for yourself and all the troops in harm's way.
We will miss all those that are not able to be here with family for the holidays, but we know they are better men and women than we are, and know that their sacrifice is working to help make this world a better place. I hope everyone is keeping these people in their prayers, especially during a time of year that undoubtedly makes it tougher to concentrate on the job at hand. I know I am.
- '93HonoluluCat
- BobcatNation Team Captain
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 3:12 am
- Location: Honolulu, HI
This may be a little off topic--okay, completely off topic--but I really think the mayor of SF has been doing a disservice to his city and to his political party.BAC wrote:
Incidentally, the City/County of SF had a measure on the ballot in November issuing a proclamation (or some other means of emoting that is meaningless from a practical standpoint) demanding that we withdraw our troops from Iraq immediately. I'm pretty sure it passed overwhelmingly, although I can't imagine anyone actually sitting down and coming to the conclusion that it would really be a good idea or the right move at this juncture.
We now rejoin the thread already in progress...
- SonomaCat
- Moderator
- Posts: 23960
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
- Location: Sonoma County, CA
- Contact:
Newsom had nothing to do with that particular resolution -- it was placed on the ballot by the Board of Supervisors. The mayor is considered conservative by San Francisco standards, and is actually doing a great job bringing some much needed reforms to the city, such as tightening spending and revamping the entire way in which we deal with the homeless (money going to drug treatment and housing as opposed to monthly welfare handouts for more drugs).'93HonoluluCat wrote:This may be a little off topic--okay, completely off topic--but I really think the mayor of SF has been doing a disservice to his city and to his political party.BAC wrote:
Incidentally, the City/County of SF had a measure on the ballot in November issuing a proclamation (or some other means of emoting that is meaningless from a practical standpoint) demanding that we withdraw our troops from Iraq immediately. I'm pretty sure it passed overwhelmingly, although I can't imagine anyone actually sitting down and coming to the conclusion that it would really be a good idea or the right move at this juncture.
We now rejoin the thread already in progress...
He may have done a disservice to his party by bringing the gay marriage thing into the national spotlight (although Massachusetts already set the bar on that one) as he brought the topic out faster than America was obviously willing to deal with it. It gave the Republicans one more bit of fear to feed upon, which certainly did Kerry no favors.
However, as a leader of the city, he was by far the best choice we had available to us, and has actually done a great job so far. In fact, the only people around here who complain about him seem to do so only because he is rich, and that in and of itself is the mark of an evil person to some in this area. Like I said -- he's considered (and criticized like) a conservative by local standards.
Heck, even Bush told Newsom that he was proud of him when they met in person last fall.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 12:44 pm
Beaker, my statement should have read "some troops", not just "troops." Poor choice of words on my part.
My statement is based on military personnel that I know and have spoken to and my own experiences. Not all of those I know are concerned about support and how it relates to morale. Most are gung-ho as all get-out. The ones who are second-guessing I sum up this way: They can't figure out how they can 'truly' be supported in an effort that has turned out to be unjustified. Yes, they feel supported in that everyone wants their mission to be a success and for a safe return, but, no, they don't feel certain that they are supported as, say, the WWII troops.
My assumption is that it is human nature to support things that represent us and, for some, if something doesn't look quite right support it with disclaimers, caveats, and excuses. I'm sure we can all think of times when we've done this.
I think one of the poster's logic is that we've gotten ourselves into this, so now we have to stay the course or the negative impacts of pulling out will be greater than any negatives of not following through. If my thinking is correct, I can't say I disagree. However, at the same time, I'd like to see efforts being made toward a peaceful resolution that will bring our men and women home with their heads held high. I realize that is a longshot, but the effort in that regard is definitely a noble one and one that I think a good portion of the troops would appreciate and see as 'support' from the folks back home.
My statement is based on military personnel that I know and have spoken to and my own experiences. Not all of those I know are concerned about support and how it relates to morale. Most are gung-ho as all get-out. The ones who are second-guessing I sum up this way: They can't figure out how they can 'truly' be supported in an effort that has turned out to be unjustified. Yes, they feel supported in that everyone wants their mission to be a success and for a safe return, but, no, they don't feel certain that they are supported as, say, the WWII troops.
My assumption is that it is human nature to support things that represent us and, for some, if something doesn't look quite right support it with disclaimers, caveats, and excuses. I'm sure we can all think of times when we've done this.
I think one of the poster's logic is that we've gotten ourselves into this, so now we have to stay the course or the negative impacts of pulling out will be greater than any negatives of not following through. If my thinking is correct, I can't say I disagree. However, at the same time, I'd like to see efforts being made toward a peaceful resolution that will bring our men and women home with their heads held high. I realize that is a longshot, but the effort in that regard is definitely a noble one and one that I think a good portion of the troops would appreciate and see as 'support' from the folks back home.
- kmax
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9567
- Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:23 pm
- Location: Belgrade, MT
- Contact:
It is a very noble goal to wish for a peaceful resolution to this, and I have very little doubt that almost everyone would love to see that as well. That said, if you have any idea of a way to bring about a peaceful resolution in a country that has been taken near the brink of civil war, I am pretty sure there would be a Nobel Peace Prize in it for you. All kidding aside, unfortunately there is just too much instability in that region right now for any realistic hope of a peaceful conclusion.iaafan wrote:I think one of the poster's logic is that we've gotten ourselves into this, so now we have to stay the course or the negative impacts of pulling out will be greater than any negatives of not following through. If my thinking is correct, I can't say I disagree. However, at the same time, I'd like to see efforts being made toward a peaceful resolution that will bring our men and women home with their heads held high. I realize that is a longshot, but the effort in that regard is definitely a noble one and one that I think a good portion of the troops would appreciate and see as 'support' from the folks back home.
I also add my thanks to Beaker, and all of the men and women that serve our country to protect our freedoms. As Bozone said, you are all stronger than I and have done more for this country than I ever will. My deepest thanks and prayers go out to all of you.
“Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be—or to be indistinguishable from—self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.” -- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon
- '93HonoluluCat
- BobcatNation Team Captain
- Posts: 433
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 3:12 am
- Location: Honolulu, HI
They can't figure out how they can 'truly' be supported in an effort that has turned out to be unjustified.
Not this again...we cussed and discussed this on another thread: here.
- SonomaCat
- Moderator
- Posts: 23960
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
- Location: Sonoma County, CA
- Contact:
While many of your posts send me running for the hills (when you are really fired up), this was really an excellent, thoughtful post that shows that you have taken the time to look at this thing from several points of view, which seems to be the best way to come to one's own conclusion.iaafan wrote:Beaker, my statement should have read "some troops", not just "troops." Poor choice of words on my part.
My statement is based on military personnel that I know and have spoken to and my own experiences. Not all of those I know are concerned about support and how it relates to morale. Most are gung-ho as all get-out. The ones who are second-guessing I sum up this way: They can't figure out how they can 'truly' be supported in an effort that has turned out to be unjustified. Yes, they feel supported in that everyone wants their mission to be a success and for a safe return, but, no, they don't feel certain that they are supported as, say, the WWII troops.
My assumption is that it is human nature to support things that represent us and, for some, if something doesn't look quite right support it with disclaimers, caveats, and excuses. I'm sure we can all think of times when we've done this.
I think one of the poster's logic is that we've gotten ourselves into this, so now we have to stay the course or the negative impacts of pulling out will be greater than any negatives of not following through. If my thinking is correct, I can't say I disagree. However, at the same time, I'd like to see efforts being made toward a peaceful resolution that will bring our men and women home with their heads held high. I realize that is a longshot, but the effort in that regard is definitely a noble one and one that I think a good portion of the troops would appreciate and see as 'support' from the folks back home.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7177
- Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 12:44 pm
There's a saying, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
But I once heard someone say, "If you pretend it ain't broke, it'll never get fixed."
Keep your slippers on BAC, and I'm sure everyone else. My approach is more trail-and-error. I'm not always sold on what I say myself, but I like to throw things out there to see where others take it, because it may just lead to something positive and unique in thought, if not in action.
But I once heard someone say, "If you pretend it ain't broke, it'll never get fixed."
Keep your slippers on BAC, and I'm sure everyone else. My approach is more trail-and-error. I'm not always sold on what I say myself, but I like to throw things out there to see where others take it, because it may just lead to something positive and unique in thought, if not in action.
- SonomaCat
- Moderator
- Posts: 23960
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
- Location: Sonoma County, CA
- Contact:
I know what you mean. There's no better way to test out an idea or theory than to throw it out to discussion. If it gets torn to shreds with valid counterarguments, it is probably a good one to ditch, but if it holds up against the scrutiny, then it could be upgraded to a closely held belief. In the process, some good discussion may be created either way, and everybody learns a little bit more.iaafan wrote:There's a saying, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
But I once heard someone say, "If you pretend it ain't broke, it'll never get fixed."
Keep your slippers on BAC, and I'm sure everyone else. My approach is more trail-and-error. I'm not always sold on what I say myself, but I like to throw things out there to see where others take it, because it may just lead to something positive and unique in thought, if not in action.
I think a lot/most of us do about the same thing in here. After all, we can't all be right on our first impression all of the time. If we were, we'd all have really cool internationally recognized titles of some sort by now.