https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exclus ... yed-donors
In this instance, when there is concern over foreign interference in elections, we can’t validate who is funding these organizations. This money could be coming from China or other countries that don’t like Trump."After downloading hundreds of millions of [dollars in] donations to the Take Back Action Fund servers, we were shocked to see that almost half of the donations to ActBlue in 2019 claimed to be unemployed individuals," he said. "The name of employers must be disclosed when making political donations, but more than 4.7 million donations came from people who claimed they did not have an employer. Those 4.7 million donations totaled $346 million ActBlue raised and sent to liberal causes."
Why is this in the mail ballots thread? While this process requires certain information be provided by “unverified” donors, mass mailing of ballots also provide the ability to remain “veiled” with no validation. Doesn’t common sense tell us that people may take advantage of the “anonymity” of mass mailing ballots in a similar manner? I don’t think that is a stretch.