Page 1 of 1

Freaks in Bozeman

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:46 am
by allcat
We seem to have at least a few people on campus that would turn us into Missoula.

Re: Freaks in Bozeman

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:47 pm
by arvcat2
Charlie Kirk & Candance Owens rock! Was that first questionnaire guy with a Cat hat on wbtfg (Mr. Russia Russia Russia conspiraist)?

Re: Freaks in Bozeman

Posted: Thu Aug 15, 2019 9:20 pm
by RickRund
arvcat2 wrote:
Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:47 pm
Charlie Kirk & Candance Owens rock! Was that first questionnaire guy with a Cat hat on wbtfg (Mr. Russia Russia Russia conspiraist)?
Yep!!!!!

What can we get that other people will have to pay for???

Re: Freaks in Bozeman

Posted: Fri Aug 16, 2019 9:35 am
by wbtfg
arvcat2 wrote:
Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:47 pm
Charlie Kirk & Candance Owens rock! Was that first questionnaire guy with a Cat hat on wbtfg (Mr. Russia Russia Russia conspiraist)?
No need to make this a personal thing. I'm sure we have our disagreements, but I'm also quite sure we agree on much more than we disagree on.

If it's okay with you, I'd prefer to keep things civil and focused on issues.

Re: Freaks in Bozeman

Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 6:11 am
by TomCat88
Yes, Gallatin county, mostly Bozeman really came through for Tester over Gianforte in the last election after most newscasts, even msnbc, had checked the box for Gianforte. That was a surprise in how lopsided it was. Not as lopsided as Missoula, but more so than expected with it being Gianforte’s hometown and “The Chosen One” Donald Trump himself coming to Bozeman and several other Montana locations to campaign against Tester.

Re: Freaks in Bozeman

Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 2:05 pm
by arvcat2
wbtfg wrote:
Fri Aug 16, 2019 9:35 am
arvcat2 wrote:
Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:47 pm
Charlie Kirk & Candance Owens rock! Was that first questionnaire guy with a Cat hat on wbtfg (Mr. Russia Russia Russia conspiraist)?
No need to make this a personal thing. I'm sure we have our disagreements, but I'm also quite sure we agree on much more than we disagree on.

If it's okay with you, I'd prefer to keep things civil and focused on issues.
Calling you a Russia conspiracist is a personal thing? Go back and re-read your “Soooooooo…Russia” thread and your posts within it. It must be so hurtful for you to be so wrong on an issue and to be so duped by the democrats and their media allies.

Re: Freaks in Bozeman

Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 3:50 pm
by wbtfg
arvcat2 wrote:
Thu Aug 22, 2019 2:05 pm
wbtfg wrote:
Fri Aug 16, 2019 9:35 am
arvcat2 wrote:
Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:47 pm
Charlie Kirk & Candance Owens rock! Was that first questionnaire guy with a Cat hat on wbtfg (Mr. Russia Russia Russia conspiraist)?
No need to make this a personal thing. I'm sure we have our disagreements, but I'm also quite sure we agree on much more than we disagree on.

If it's okay with you, I'd prefer to keep things civil and focused on issues.
Calling you a Russia conspiracist is a personal thing? Go back and re-read your “Soooooooo…Russia” thread and your posts within it. It must be so hurtful for you to be so wrong on an issue and to be so duped by the democrats and their media allies.
I mean you specifically brought my name into something I have no involvement in. I'm not hurt, I'm just not sure what you're trying to accomplish or what this has to do with me specifically.

Re: Freaks in Bozeman

Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2019 11:32 am
by iaafan
wbtfg wrote:
Thu Aug 22, 2019 3:50 pm
arvcat2 wrote:
Thu Aug 22, 2019 2:05 pm
wbtfg wrote:
Fri Aug 16, 2019 9:35 am
arvcat2 wrote:
Thu Aug 15, 2019 7:47 pm
Charlie Kirk & Candance Owens rock! Was that first questionnaire guy with a Cat hat on wbtfg (Mr. Russia Russia Russia conspiraist)?
No need to make this a personal thing. I'm sure we have our disagreements, but I'm also quite sure we agree on much more than we disagree on.

If it's okay with you, I'd prefer to keep things civil and focused on issues.
Calling you a Russia conspiracist is a personal thing? Go back and re-read your “Soooooooo…Russia” thread and your posts within it. It must be so hurtful for you to be so wrong on an issue and to be so duped by the democrats and their media allies.
I mean you specifically brought my name into something I have no involvement in. I'm not hurt, I'm just not sure what you're trying to accomplish or what this has to do with me specifically.
Still waiting for a response from arvcat2.