Matt McKay

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

User avatar
BleedingBLue
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 6187
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by BleedingBLue » Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:40 am

grizzh8r wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:32 am
Montanabob wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:20 am
AFCAT wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:00 am
Montanabob wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:51 am
BelligerentBobcat wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:48 am
thefrank1 wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:10 am
Contrary to claims on this thread, Mellot did throw yesterday and looked like a freshman who is no where near ready to play QB in D1 football.
I’m confused as to what he did that showed he’s not ready? He didn’t exactly do a lot passing, but he didn’t do anything that showed he isn’t ready, imo. Threw a solid hitch route, and then his sideline pass was too low, but it was still catchable. Gardner just dropped it.
Better accuracy than a lot McKay passes.
He was 50%.
And McKay 47% and missing wide open receivers.
Dude, give it up already. Did McKay steal your wife or something? Why do you hate him so much? He has his flaws, just like most FCS QB's do, but he's clearly the best option as the starter for MSU, and is the best we as Bobcat fans have seen in a half decade. I truly don't understand your level of expectations. The man is 7-1 as a starter for cripes sake! I don't recall you being this vocal about the largely very average QB play that MSU experienced during Choate's tenure here, please enlighten us as to why you continue to rip Matt.
Oh he was. Remember he thought Beltran, who is Drake's current 3rd string QB, should be our starter?



tetoncat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2953
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:14 pm
Location: Montana

Re: Matt McKay

Post by tetoncat » Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:49 am

Interesting that we haven't seen Mellot have to read a defense or look for the open receiver but some are ready for him. He is listed at fourth string. He will not be the next man up.

McKay had some bad passes, had some drops, and completely missed the TE on the one. But had some good td's, had two really nice runs for first downs.


Sports is not bigger than life

MountainCat
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 184
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 8:41 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by MountainCat » Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:52 am

Matt has had some struggles, maybe it’s just me but I would kind of expect that in the first year under a different OC running a less mobile offense than I may have been used to at my previous school, some challenges could crop up. His numbers are solid, not spectacular. His timing and accuracy have been off at moments for sure, but I personally thought that yesterday’s game made a glaring point of what might be the bigger issue and surprisingly nobody has said much about it: To my humble and untrained eye, Matt is at his best when he is mixing up the run and pass on a faster pace. He seems to get out of sync quickly when we simply try to “pound” the ball without mixing it up Some might say “but, we’re a team the pound the ball, it’s just our style”. Is it? We have a brand new OC that seems to be altering every game to figure out being an OC, sometimes to extremes it seems. Personally, I feel that Housewright doesn’t fit the offense to Matt as well as he could during stretches but instead calls a game based on his idea of a mix, potentially to a detriment. I feel like Matt goes as the OC goes most of the time, but Matt receives the criticism as the guy on the field. There’s a lot of learning going on from multiple directions in my opinion.

We’re 7-1 and I can’t say that Matt has “cost” us a game this year. New Head coach, new OC, new quarterback, that’s a lot of feeling out and we’re still doing alright.



Marana CAT
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 465
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:08 pm
Location: Whiskey Buttes

Re: Matt McKay

Post by Marana CAT » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:06 pm

Watch what McKay does on 3rd and 1 at the 6:16 mark in the 3rd quarter and then tell me you want a QB change. He is an unselfish Leader that gives everything he has to help the Cats at achieving TEAM goals!!!


"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but I will kick you repeatedly in the balls, Gardocki!"

User avatar
GoCats18
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3496
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: MT

Re: Matt McKay

Post by GoCats18 » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:17 pm

Do people realize there are 10 other guys out there with McKay that have to do their job as well? I saw several times yesterday were the defensive had guys get to McKay and they weren’t even touched at the line of scrimmage. Receivers drop some easy catches. It takes everyone doing their job. Good lord people we are 4 points away from being 8-0.


Punters are people too!!

MSU01
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7655
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:21 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by MSU01 » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:22 pm

After yesterday's game, McKay now has a 15/1 TD/INT ratio and moved from 5th to 3rd in FCS passing efficiency.



User avatar
wbtfg
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:52 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by wbtfg » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:24 pm

MSU01 wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:22 pm
After yesterday's game, McKay now has a 15/1 TD/INT ratio and moved from 5th to 3rd in FCS passing efficiency.
In addition to a 7-1 record.



User avatar
codecat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2656
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: Laurel

Re: Matt McKay

Post by codecat » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:35 pm

The bottom line, no matter who is behind center this year, is that however our passing attack goes, so goes the offense because we do not have the same blocking capability up front that we did last year to be able to run on most anyone whenever we wanted.


London Bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down, London Bridge is falling down, Bye-Bye Fauci!

MSU01
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7655
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 5:21 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by MSU01 » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:40 pm

codecat wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:35 pm
The bottom line, no matter who is behind center this year, is that however our passing attack goes, so goes the offense because we do not have the same blocking capability up front that we did last year to be able to run on most anyone whenever we wanted.
Is that really true? MSU averages 5.4 YPC this year which is only down by 0.3 from their 5.7 YPC in 2019.



User avatar
coloradocat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4886
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:24 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by coloradocat » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:41 pm

MountainCat wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:52 am
Matt has had some struggles, maybe it’s just me but I would kind of expect that in the first year under a different OC running a less mobile offense than I may have been used to at my previous school, some challenges could crop up. His numbers are solid, not spectacular. His timing and accuracy have been off at moments for sure, but I personally thought that yesterday’s game made a glaring point of what might be the bigger issue and surprisingly nobody has said much about it: To my humble and untrained eye, Matt is at his best when he is mixing up the run and pass on a faster pace. He seems to get out of sync quickly when we simply try to “pound” the ball without mixing it up Some might say “but, we’re a team the pound the ball, it’s just our style”. Is it? We have a brand new OC that seems to be altering every game to figure out being an OC, sometimes to extremes it seems. Personally, I feel that Housewright doesn’t fit the offense to Matt as well as he could during stretches but instead calls a game based on his idea of a mix, potentially to a detriment. I feel like Matt goes as the OC goes most of the time, but Matt receives the criticism as the guy on the field. There’s a lot of learning going on from multiple directions in my opinion.

We’re 7-1 and I can’t say that Matt has “cost” us a game this year. New Head coach, new OC, new quarterback, that’s a lot of feeling out and we’re still doing alright.
Good points about Housewright. While Banks seems like a natural as DC, Housewright is still figuring out the OC role in his first year calling plays.


Eastwood, did not make it. Ball out! Recovered, by Montana State!! The Bobcats hold!!! The Bobcats hold!!!

BelligerentBobcat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2734
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2021 6:58 am

Re: Matt McKay

Post by BelligerentBobcat » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:41 pm

Montanabob wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:51 am
BelligerentBobcat wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:48 am
thefrank1 wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:10 am
Contrary to claims on this thread, Mellot did throw yesterday and looked like a freshman who is no where near ready to play QB in D1 football.
I’m confused as to what he did that showed he’s not ready? He didn’t exactly do a lot passing, but he didn’t do anything that showed he isn’t ready, imo. Threw a solid hitch route, and then his sideline pass was too low, but it was still catchable. Gardner just dropped it.
Better accuracy than a lot McKay passes.
And worse than a lot of McKay passes too.



User avatar
Cledus
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5471
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2006 3:18 pm
Location: Billings Heights

Re: Matt McKay

Post by Cledus » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:43 pm

coloradocat wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:41 pm
MountainCat wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:52 am
Matt has had some struggles, maybe it’s just me but I would kind of expect that in the first year under a different OC running a less mobile offense than I may have been used to at my previous school, some challenges could crop up. His numbers are solid, not spectacular. His timing and accuracy have been off at moments for sure, but I personally thought that yesterday’s game made a glaring point of what might be the bigger issue and surprisingly nobody has said much about it: To my humble and untrained eye, Matt is at his best when he is mixing up the run and pass on a faster pace. He seems to get out of sync quickly when we simply try to “pound” the ball without mixing it up Some might say “but, we’re a team the pound the ball, it’s just our style”. Is it? We have a brand new OC that seems to be altering every game to figure out being an OC, sometimes to extremes it seems. Personally, I feel that Housewright doesn’t fit the offense to Matt as well as he could during stretches but instead calls a game based on his idea of a mix, potentially to a detriment. I feel like Matt goes as the OC goes most of the time, but Matt receives the criticism as the guy on the field. There’s a lot of learning going on from multiple directions in my opinion.

We’re 7-1 and I can’t say that Matt has “cost” us a game this year. New Head coach, new OC, new quarterback, that’s a lot of feeling out and we’re still doing alright.
Good points about Housewright. While Banks seems like a natural as DC, Housewright is still figuring out the OC role in his first year calling plays.
It took Matt Miller awhile to get his legs. The North Dakota game was like the Weber Game this year, it was a turning point.


UM is the university equivalent of Axe Body Spray and essential oils.

User avatar
codecat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2656
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 1:38 pm
Location: Laurel

Re: Matt McKay

Post by codecat » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:51 pm

MSU01 wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:40 pm
codecat wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:35 pm
The bottom line, no matter who is behind center this year, is that however our passing attack goes, so goes the offense because we do not have the same blocking capability up front that we did last year to be able to run on most anyone whenever we wanted.
Is that really true? MSU averages 5.4 YPC this year which is only down by 0.3 from their 5.7 YPC in 2019.
Just saying: Its a well know tenant of American football that unless you can stretch the field both vertically and horizontally, the run game will struggle against good defenses unless you dominate on the LOS.


London Bridge is falling down, falling down, falling down, London Bridge is falling down, Bye-Bye Fauci!

ilovethecats
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 6510
Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:12 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by ilovethecats » Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:52 pm

So funny. Some people have such unrealistic expectations. These guys aren’t going to be perfect. In the case of McKay, he’s going to make mistakes. He’s going to miss open receivers. Even yesterday there were some plays where I was kind of scratching my head. But as a WHOLE he’s doing great, as a team we’re in a great spot.

Name any qb you want at any level of football and I’ll find mistakes they made. Hell, anyone watching Mahomes and the Chiefs right now?! I’ve seen about 10 “bad” plays by mahomes already and by all accounts, he’s a pretty decent player.

I swear some people expect a quarterback to complete 100% of their passes, score touchdowns every single drive, have zero penalties every game, and never make a mistake.

If you have serious qualms about our qb play right now, honestly you’re just searching for something to bitch about.

In my humble opinion.



User avatar
tdub
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1957
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 8:41 pm
Location: Kalispell

Re: Matt McKay

Post by tdub » Sun Oct 24, 2021 1:21 pm

grizzh8r wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:32 am
Montanabob wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:20 am
AFCAT wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 11:00 am
Montanabob wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:51 am
BelligerentBobcat wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:48 am
thefrank1 wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:10 am
Contrary to claims on this thread, Mellot did throw yesterday and looked like a freshman who is no where near ready to play QB in D1 football.
I’m confused as to what he did that showed he’s not ready? He didn’t exactly do a lot passing, but he didn’t do anything that showed he isn’t ready, imo. Threw a solid hitch route, and then his sideline pass was too low, but it was still catchable. Gardner just dropped it.
Better accuracy than a lot McKay passes.
He was 50%.
And McKay 47% and missing wide open receivers.
Dude, give it up already. Did McKay steal your wife or something? Why do you hate him so much? He has his flaws, just like most FCS QB's do, but he's clearly the best option as the starter for MSU, and is the best we as Bobcat fans have seen in a half decade. I truly don't understand your level of expectations. The man is 7-1 as a starter for cripes sake! I don't recall you being this vocal about the largely very average QB play that MSU experienced during Choate's tenure here, please enlighten us as to why you continue to rip Matt.
It’s been his schtick for a long time now. He’s s#!ts all over the starting QB, calling for someone else. He pounded the Beltran drum for as long as he was at MSU.


Gold medals aren't really made of gold. They're made of sweat, determination, and a hard-to-find alloy called guts. - Dan Gable

User avatar
utucats
Member # Retired
Posts: 2882
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:58 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by utucats » Sun Oct 24, 2021 2:01 pm

PapaG wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 11:28 pm
utucats wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 10:20 pm
94VegasCat wrote:
Sat Oct 23, 2021 10:17 pm
We lost once this season with a phantom holding call. Mellot isn’t the answer to people thinking he’d be better than McKay. You’re nuts if you truly believe that.
We’ve lost once but our defense can’t be expected to completely dominate every game. We have to have an offensive presence that is more than just Ifanse dragging the other teams D down the field.
So, is putting in a true freshman who has a five play playbook when the team is 7-1 and heading for a huge game in Cheney what you propose? That’s such a ridiculous take it makes me wonder if you’ve ever been on a team or in a locker room. If MSU lost the game using your idea, Vigen loses the locker room but that’s only in fantasy world. It’s such an unrealistic idea that you must be trolling.
I don’t know Papa, can you read? Did I propose that we replace McKay with Tommy? I said that McKay’s play has not been dynamic. I acknowledged that he is not turnover prone. I made the point that we are constantly finding ways to get Tommy in to the game which tells me that he is just to good to leave out. That makes me wonder if he shouldn’t be the permanent guy.

I know that laying out a few thoughts and wondering what others think is not what this place is about so, in the future, I suppose we can all figure out Papa’s take and just follow his logic.

Nah, McKay’s play the last two games, minus the ISU 2nd half, needs to improve if we have a shot at a deep playoff run. If you can’t acknowledge that you must be trolling.

Those were my statements. I’ve been in locker rooms but based on your reading comprehension I’m wondering if you’ve been to a library?


Image

CPACAT
Member # Retired
Posts: 2378
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 5:55 pm
Location: Great Falls

Re: Matt McKay

Post by CPACAT » Sun Oct 24, 2021 2:09 pm

So we had 9 possessions and scored on 5. 1 turnover 3 punts.

For those that are down on McKay, what matrices would be acceptable? 7-1? 15/1? Near 70% completion percentage?

Mellott has been great when He has been in but he is more a change of pace right now that a full time option.


IYAACYAS

User avatar
wbtfg
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 13634
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:52 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by wbtfg » Sun Oct 24, 2021 2:11 pm

ilovethecats wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 12:52 pm
So funny. Some people have such unrealistic expectations. These guys aren’t going to be perfect. In the case of McKay, he’s going to make mistakes. He’s going to miss open receivers. Even yesterday there were some plays where I was kind of scratching my head. But as a WHOLE he’s doing great, as a team we’re in a great spot.

Name any qb you want at any level of football and I’ll find mistakes they made. Hell, anyone watching Mahomes and the Chiefs right now?! I’ve seen about 10 “bad” plays by mahomes already and by all accounts, he’s a pretty decent player.

I swear some people expect a quarterback to complete 100% of their passes, score touchdowns every single drive, have zero penalties every game, and never make a mistake.

If you have serious qualms about our qb play right now, honestly you’re just searching for something to bitch about.

In my humble opinion.
On point, per usual.



User avatar
utucats
Member # Retired
Posts: 2882
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:58 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by utucats » Sun Oct 24, 2021 2:15 pm

CPACAT wrote:
Sun Oct 24, 2021 2:09 pm
So we had 9 possessions and scored on 5. 1 turnover 3 punts.

For those that are down on McKay, what matrices would be acceptable? 7-1? 15/1? Near 70% completion percentage?

Mellott has been great when He has been in but he is more a change of pace right now that a full time option.
Well 7-1 is a team statistic. Players move up and down the depth chart all the time based on individual performance.

It’s entirely possible that McKay’s struggles can be attributed to other factors. Perhaps a more aggressive style of play calling would get him into a groove quicker. Perhaps our offense had a little hangover from struggling to move the ball against Weber. Whatever the reason, he threw some ugly balls yesterday.

Hoping we continue improving and McKay finds his groove. In order for us to take the next step we have to find a passing attack that is respectable.


Image

PortlandCat90
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 412
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:23 pm

Re: Matt McKay

Post by PortlandCat90 » Sun Oct 24, 2021 3:04 pm

I have compiled many of the thoughts from this thread, pulled some facts and will send them to Coach V for his response. Here is my first draft:

Dear Coach:

WE ARE Bobcat Nation and have many concerns about our quarterbacking, specifically:

•We are 7-1 overall
• We are undefeated and in first place in the Big Sky at 5-0

Our QB is leading an offensive team that is/has:
o 2nd in the Big Sky in scoring
o 3rd in the Big Sky in total yardage
o 1st in the Big Sky in rushing yardage
o The leading rusher in the Big Sky

Our QB is:
o 2nd in the Big Sky in passing efficiency
o 2nd in the Big Sky in passing completion %
o 1st in the Big Sky in least passing interceptions
o 2nd in the Big Sky in passing touchdowns
o Showing strong leadership in what could be a strange season back

Several of Bobcat Nation have expressed concern and singled out our starting QB, noting that he is not good enough.

Please provide your input.

On behalf of Bobcat Nation,

PortlandCat90

P.S. I just re-read this letter and I do not think that I will send it to you at the risk of looking like a complete dumba$$. Please tell our QB that the rest of us in Bobcat Nation are proud of him, believe in him, and will ride along as he, his teammates and coaches take us where we are going.



Post Reply