Stadium Improvements

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

gtapp
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5035
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 2:09 pm
Location: Minneapolis, MN

Stadium Improvements

Post by gtapp » Thu Feb 05, 2026 7:47 am

We have been spoiled with some level of stadium improvement each year. Last year was the addition of stands in front of the athletic complex. Will there be anything new for 2026?


Gary Tapp
Graduated MSU 1981
Hamilton High School
Minneapolis, MN

lutecat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by lutecat » Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:26 am

If we can we need to announce something major. Take all the wind out of everything going on in Missoula yesterday. That would be awesome.



User avatar
Common Cat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3628
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 9:10 am
Location: Spokane

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by Common Cat » Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am

Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.


Golden Coolie

User avatar
kennethnoisewater
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3989
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 12:41 pm
Location: Kalispell, MT

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by kennethnoisewater » Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:48 am

Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Don't forget the river. And the inflatable helmet runout...all the best high school programs are doing that still.


Image

lutecat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by lutecat » Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am

Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....



User avatar
wbtfg
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 14869
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:52 pm

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by wbtfg » Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:56 am

kennethnoisewater wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:48 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Don't forget the river. And the inflatable helmet runout...all the best high school programs are doing that still.
Don't forget Monte.... :lol:



User avatar
wbtfg
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 14869
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:52 pm

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by wbtfg » Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:05 am

lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
I haven't been in the UM champion center, but my understanding is that the facility is used by all/most sports, MSU's BAC is pretty much a football only facility. Also, I think UM's has a cool vibe in terms of celebrating and memorializing past successes...so it probably has a cooler vibe/feel to it museum type lighting. I would say that MSU's BAC is more functional for a football team.

Square footage
BAC: 40,000
UMCC: 51,000



wapiti
Honorable Mention All-BobcatNation
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 11:04 am

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by wapiti » Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:18 am

wbtfg wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:05 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
I haven't been in the UM champion center, but my understanding is that the facility is used by all/most sports, MSU's BAC is pretty much a football only facility. Also, I think UM's has a cool vibe in terms of celebrating and memorializing past successes...so it probably has a cooler vibe/feel to it museum type lighting. I would say that MSU's BAC is more functional for a football team.

Square footage
BAC: 40,000
UMCC: 51,000
If the UM CC is shared, how much square footage is for football? Compared to MSU football having 40,000 square feet.



User avatar
wbtfg
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 14869
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:52 pm

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by wbtfg » Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:36 am

wapiti wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:18 am
wbtfg wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:05 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
I haven't been in the UM champion center, but my understanding is that the facility is used by all/most sports, MSU's BAC is pretty much a football only facility. Also, I think UM's has a cool vibe in terms of celebrating and memorializing past successes...so it probably has a cooler vibe/feel to it museum type lighting. I would say that MSU's BAC is more functional for a football team.

Square footage
BAC: 40,000
UMCC: 51,000
If the UM CC is shared, how much square footage is for football? Compared to MSU football having 40,000 square feet.
I don't know the answer, but that's exactly my point. It's not an apples to apples comparison.



User avatar
technoCat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4940
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:06 pm
Location: Bozeman

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by technoCat » Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:43 am

wbtfg wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:36 am
wapiti wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:18 am
wbtfg wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:05 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
I haven't been in the UM champion center, but my understanding is that the facility is used by all/most sports, MSU's BAC is pretty much a football only facility. Also, I think UM's has a cool vibe in terms of celebrating and memorializing past successes...so it probably has a cooler vibe/feel to it museum type lighting. I would say that MSU's BAC is more functional for a football team.

Square footage
BAC: 40,000
UMCC: 51,000
If the UM CC is shared, how much square footage is for football? Compared to MSU football having 40,000 square feet.
I don't know the answer, but that's exactly my point. It's not an apples to apples comparison.
Yeah if the UMCC is for everyone, wouldn't we include all the renovations to the BRICK and adjoining buildings done for all the other sports?


DIE HARD CATS FAN SINCE THE DAY I WAS BORN

User avatar
AFCAT
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 14902
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:25 pm

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by AFCAT » Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:44 am

wbtfg wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:05 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
I haven't been in the UM champion center, but my understanding is that the facility is used by all/most sports, MSU's BAC is pretty much a football only facility. Also, I think UM's has a cool vibe in terms of celebrating and memorializing past successes...so it probably has a cooler vibe/feel to it museum type lighting. I would say that MSU's BAC is more functional for a football team.

Square footage
BAC: 40,000
UMCC: 51,000
The BAC is also used by all sports, it isn't exclusive to the football team, but they do hold most of the square footage and, probably, use it most often. I know the weight room, fueling station, clinic, big meeting room(s), and recovery/re-hab areas are all used by other sports. There are even lockers available for other athletes.


QB Club https://www.msubqc.org
Bobcat Collective https://bobcatcollective.com/

This is history fulfilled - National Champions.

Colter_Nuanez
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10870
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: Big Sky Country
Contact:

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by Colter_Nuanez » Fri Feb 06, 2026 9:59 am

lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
Honestly, not fair to compare the two facilities because they are different. In terms of the facility comparison, Champions Center vs BAC, from a pure, player only facility for locker rooms and training, Champions Center is slightly better. It's a bit more spacious, a bit bigger and nicer weight room, a tad nicer locker room.

But in terms of the total facility, the BAC is better. Because it has multiple stories for coaches offices, GM office, rehab and training rooms, nutrition rooms, nicer meeting rooms, bigger meeting rooms, it's directly attached to the stadium.

Both are tremendous facilities.

Ratings:
Washington-Grizzly Stadium 98, Bobcat Stadium 95

BAC 95, Champions Center 96

Indoor practice facilities - Bobcats 96, Griz 80.

Indoor track - Cats 95, Griz don't have one

Dahlberg Arena - 88, declining and stale but still nice.

Brick Breedin Fieldhouse - 85 - still some flaws, but has gotten way better.

Outdoor track - Cats - 92

Dornsblaser - 84

Softball field - UM 85, Cats don't have one

Soccer filed - UM 80, Cats don't have one

Ski hills - 95, Griz don't have skiing

Tennis - MSU - 75, Griz go to the Peak in Missoula, which is a 90, but a gym, not close to campus.

What did I miss?



User avatar
D-Wreck
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1036
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 7:23 am
Location: The Magic City

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by D-Wreck » Fri Feb 06, 2026 10:49 am

Colter_Nuanez wrote:
Fri Feb 06, 2026 9:59 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
Honestly, not fair to compare the two facilities because they are different. In terms of the facility comparison, Champions Center vs BAC, from a pure, player only facility for locker rooms and training, Champions Center is slightly better. It's a bit more spacious, a bit bigger and nicer weight room, a tad nicer locker room.

But in terms of the total facility, the BAC is better. Because it has multiple stories for coaches offices, GM office, rehab and training rooms, nutrition rooms, nicer meeting rooms, bigger meeting rooms, it's directly attached to the stadium.

Both are tremendous facilities.

Ratings:
Washington-Grizzly Stadium 98, Bobcat Stadium 95

BAC 95, Champions Center 96

Indoor practice facilities - Bobcats 96, Griz 80.

Indoor track - Cats 95, Griz don't have one

Dahlberg Arena - 88, declining and stale but still nice.

Brick Breedin Fieldhouse - 85 - still some flaws, but has gotten way better.

Outdoor track - Cats - 92

Dornsblaser - 84

Softball field - UM 85, Cats don't have one

Soccer filed - UM 80, Cats don't have one

Ski hills - 95, Griz don't have skiing

Tennis - MSU - 75, Griz go to the Peak in Missoula, which is a 90, but a gym, not close to campus.

What did I miss?
Hmmm... Maybe Colter isn't really a grislly fan. He forgot to include the river! :lol: :lol: :lol:


You can't spell dUMb without UM and now you can't spell grizzLLies without 2 Ls.

ECBobcat
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 258
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 10:13 am

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by ECBobcat » Fri Feb 06, 2026 11:46 am

Colter_Nuanez wrote:
Fri Feb 06, 2026 9:59 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
Honestly, not fair to compare the two facilities because they are different. In terms of the facility comparison, Champions Center vs BAC, from a pure, player only facility for locker rooms and training, Champions Center is slightly better. It's a bit more spacious, a bit bigger and nicer weight room, a tad nicer locker room.

But in terms of the total facility, the BAC is better. Because it has multiple stories for coaches offices, GM office, rehab and training rooms, nutrition rooms, nicer meeting rooms, bigger meeting rooms, it's directly attached to the stadium.

Both are tremendous facilities.

Ratings:
Washington-Grizzly Stadium 98, Bobcat Stadium 95

BAC 95, Champions Center 96

Indoor practice facilities - Bobcats 96, Griz 80.

Indoor track - Cats 95, Griz don't have one

Dahlberg Arena - 88, declining and stale but still nice.

Brick Breedin Fieldhouse - 85 - still some flaws, but has gotten way better.

Outdoor track - Cats - 92

Dornsblaser - 84

Softball field - UM 85, Cats don't have one

Soccer filed - UM 80, Cats don't have one

Ski hills - 95, Griz don't have skiing

Tennis - MSU - 75, Griz go to the Peak in Missoula, which is a 90, but a gym, not close to campus.

What did I miss?
Rodeo. 😉



TomCat88
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 22342
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 6:16 am
Location: An endless run of moguls

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by TomCat88 » Fri Feb 06, 2026 12:24 pm

I’m pretty sure donors are able to direct the donations to the project of their choice. I wonder what percentage of donations are going towards the stadium.


MSU - 17 team National Champions (most recent 2025); 57 individual National Champions (most recent 2023).
toM StUber

lutecat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4546
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 6:58 pm

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by lutecat » Sat Feb 07, 2026 7:24 am

Colter_Nuanez wrote:
Fri Feb 06, 2026 9:59 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
Honestly, not fair to compare the two facilities because they are different. In terms of the facility comparison, Champions Center vs BAC, from a pure, player only facility for locker rooms and training, Champions Center is slightly better. It's a bit more spacious, a bit bigger and nicer weight room, a tad nicer locker room.

But in terms of the total facility, the BAC is better. Because it has multiple stories for coaches offices, GM office, rehab and training rooms, nutrition rooms, nicer meeting rooms, bigger meeting rooms, it's directly attached to the stadium.

Both are tremendous facilities.

Ratings:
Washington-Grizzly Stadium 98, Bobcat Stadium 95

BAC 95, Champions Center 96

Indoor practice facilities - Bobcats 96, Griz 80.

Indoor track - Cats 95, Griz don't have one

Dahlberg Arena - 88, declining and stale but still nice.

Brick Breedin Fieldhouse - 85 - still some flaws, but has gotten way better.

Outdoor track - Cats - 92

Dornsblaser - 84

Softball field - UM 85, Cats don't have one

Soccer filed - UM 80, Cats don't have one

Ski hills - 95, Griz don't have skiing

Tennis - MSU - 75, Griz go to the Peak in Missoula, which is a 90, but a gym, not close to campus.

What did I miss?
Thank you. I appreciate the rundown @Colter_Nuanez

Schmidt in a tweet mentions if we were to move up we would add women's soccer. Is the intramural field that we play lacross on big enough for soccer or would we have to build a new one? And if we did do you have any idea where it would go? Would the indoor facitliy be the right size for either school? And does soccer get to use the griz bubble?



110010110
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 291
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 9:19 pm

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by 110010110 » Sat Feb 07, 2026 8:12 am

Colter_Nuanez wrote:
Fri Feb 06, 2026 9:59 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
Honestly, not fair to compare the two facilities because they are different. In terms of the facility comparison, Champions Center vs BAC, from a pure, player only facility for locker rooms and training, Champions Center is slightly better. It's a bit more spacious, a bit bigger and nicer weight room, a tad nicer locker room.

But in terms of the total facility, the BAC is better. Because it has multiple stories for coaches offices, GM office, rehab and training rooms, nutrition rooms, nicer meeting rooms, bigger meeting rooms, it's directly attached to the stadium.

Both are tremendous facilities.

Ratings:
Washington-Grizzly Stadium 98, Bobcat Stadium 95

BAC 95, Champions Center 96

Indoor practice facilities - Bobcats 96, Griz 80.

Indoor track - Cats 95, Griz don't have one

Dahlberg Arena - 88, declining and stale but still nice.

Brick Breedin Fieldhouse - 85 - still some flaws, but has gotten way better.

Outdoor track - Cats - 92

Dornsblaser - 84

Softball field - UM 85, Cats don't have one

Soccer filed - UM 80, Cats don't have one

Ski hills - 95, Griz don't have skiing

Tennis - MSU - 75, Griz go to the Peak in Missoula, which is a 90, but a gym, not close to campus.

What did I miss?
Obviously its "just" a non-varsity sport, but with the improvements to the Ice Barn this summer the MSU Hockey team with have the better rink starting next year too. God I miss the Ice Garden.



User avatar
catgrad05
Member # Retired
Posts: 2527
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:51 am
Location: North Central Montna

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by catgrad05 » Sat Feb 07, 2026 8:27 am

Kind of surprised no one has mentioned the turf upgrade that should be happing this offseason!



Shouldn’t their be a championship added to the field 😎



User avatar
AFCAT
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 14902
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:25 pm

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by AFCAT » Sat Feb 07, 2026 10:40 am

lutecat wrote:
Sat Feb 07, 2026 7:24 am
Colter_Nuanez wrote:
Fri Feb 06, 2026 9:59 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
Honestly, not fair to compare the two facilities because they are different. In terms of the facility comparison, Champions Center vs BAC, from a pure, player only facility for locker rooms and training, Champions Center is slightly better. It's a bit more spacious, a bit bigger and nicer weight room, a tad nicer locker room.

But in terms of the total facility, the BAC is better. Because it has multiple stories for coaches offices, GM office, rehab and training rooms, nutrition rooms, nicer meeting rooms, bigger meeting rooms, it's directly attached to the stadium.

Both are tremendous facilities.

Ratings:
Washington-Grizzly Stadium 98, Bobcat Stadium 95

BAC 95, Champions Center 96

Indoor practice facilities - Bobcats 96, Griz 80.

Indoor track - Cats 95, Griz don't have one

Dahlberg Arena - 88, declining and stale but still nice.

Brick Breedin Fieldhouse - 85 - still some flaws, but has gotten way better.

Outdoor track - Cats - 92

Dornsblaser - 84

Softball field - UM 85, Cats don't have one

Soccer filed - UM 80, Cats don't have one

Ski hills - 95, Griz don't have skiing

Tennis - MSU - 75, Griz go to the Peak in Missoula, which is a 90, but a gym, not close to campus.

What did I miss?
Thank you. I appreciate the rundown @Colter_Nuanez

Schmidt in a tweet mentions if we were to move up we would add women's soccer. Is the intramural field that we play lacross on big enough for soccer or would we have to build a new one? And if we did do you have any idea where it would go? Would the indoor facitliy be the right size for either school? And does soccer get to use the griz bubble?
Lambert field already supports soccer and is an NCAA regulation field. Tessman already said that he could envision a new soccer field on Dyche field someday.


QB Club https://www.msubqc.org
Bobcat Collective https://bobcatcollective.com/

This is history fulfilled - National Champions.

Norsky19
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:24 am

Re: Stadium Improvements

Post by Norsky19 » Sat Feb 07, 2026 10:44 am

AFCAT wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:44 am
wbtfg wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 9:05 am
lutecat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:55 am
Common Cat wrote:
Thu Feb 05, 2026 8:41 am
Tessman’s legacy can start and be solidified by improving our stadium. Missoula has us beat here. In my estimation it’s the only thing they have on us.
Just listened to @Colter_Nuanez show from last night. He has the indoor practice facility as the only thing we beat them on. Everything else they have us on and that includes our BAC v their Champion Center. I have a hard time believing that since we built ours after them and honestly I'd like to hear in what ways theirs is better. I have asked this a couple times.

Their's doesnt have a 2025 Natty trophy in it so.....
I haven't been in the UM champion center, but my understanding is that the facility is used by all/most sports, MSU's BAC is pretty much a football only facility. Also, I think UM's has a cool vibe in terms of celebrating and memorializing past successes...so it probably has a cooler vibe/feel to it museum type lighting. I would say that MSU's BAC is more functional for a football team.

Square footage
BAC: 40,000
UMCC: 51,000
The BAC is also used by all sports, it isn't exclusive to the football team, but they do hold most of the square footage and, probably, use it most often. I know the weight room, fueling station, clinic, big meeting room(s), and recovery/re-hab areas are all used by other sports. There are even lockers available for other athletes.
Retired FBS strength coach here: As far as shared, teams are in different seasons and rotate through at different times. Also, football is staggered often times with positions. OL/DL then 40 min later LB's/RB/TE, then receivers/DB's and kickers etc. If squats are the primary that day then this allows the players to all get a rack and by the time they finish and move on the auxiliary exercises, the racks are available for the next group.

You can easily manage multiple teams at the same time except football which has the most athletes.



Post Reply