--------------------------STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE-------------------------
Let's Start by setting the stage with the Strength of Schedule
These are both updated to include the playoff games they have played
Via Warren Nolan
-----MSU #1-----
-----UM #30-----
Via Massey Ratings
------MSU #5------
------UM #15------
Average Winning Percentage of Teams Played (Including Playoffs)
----------MSU - 0.6282 (#1 in FCS)---------------
----------UM - 0.5135 (#30 in FCS)---------------
Average Margin of Victory (Including Playoffs)
--------------MSU - 19.7 (#3 in FCS)--------------
-------------- UM - 18.0 (#5 in FCS)--------------
Wins Against Top 25 Teams that were Top 25 at the EoY (Including Playoffs)
------------------MSU wins against #3, #10, #11, #24-----------------------------
---------------(4 total, 1 Away and 3 Home, 2 top 10)---------------------------
--------------------UM wins against #12, #16, #19--------------------------------
-------------------(3 total, All at Home, no top 10)------------------------------
Total All Americans Played Against this Year Via SI
--------------------MSU - 28-----------------------
---------------------UM - 16-----------------------
-----------------------TEAM STATISTICS--------------------------
Here is how MSU and UM compare in Team Statistics
I have highlighted where each team has the advantage
with their respective colors...
|-------MSU---------|----Team Statistic----|--------UM----------|
|---464.9 (4th)-----|----Total Offense-----|---436.2 (17th)---|
|---317.3 (11th)---|----Total Defense-----|---396.3 (86th)---|
|------26 (4th)------|------TO Gained-------|-----26 (4th)------|
|-----10 (10th)------|-------TO Lost---------|----12 (25th)------|
|----[+16 (3rd)]-----|------TO Margin-------|---[+14 (5th)]-----|
|----37.4 (9th)------|---Scoring Offense---|-----42.3(3rd)-----|
|----17.64(6th)-----|---Scoring Defense---|----23.79(33rd)---|
|---.475(10th)------|--3rd Down Con Of%--|----.463(17th)----|
|---.335(13th)------|--3rd Down Con Df%--|----.402(65th)----|
|------4 (5th)--------|----Defensive TDs ----|-----2 (24th)------|
|------11(8th)-------|-------Fum Rec--------|-----5 (80th)-------|
|------6(45th)-------|-------Fum Lost--------|----4 (17th)-------|
|----202.1(70th)----|---Passing Offense----|---287.1 (6th)----|
|----199.9 (36th)---|---Passing Defense----|--261.3 (115th)--|
|----234.1 (4th)----|---Rushing Offense----|---176.9 (36th)---|
|---117.4 (14th)----|---Rushing Defense----|---135.0 (39th)--|
|----4.43(26th)-----|---TFL Allowed/Gm----|---5.43 (52nd)---|
|----5.90(46th)-----|----TFL Per Game------|----5.30 (71st)---|
|----0.28 (5th)------|---INT Thrown/GM----|----0.57 (43rd)---|
|----1.07 (6th)------|----Passes INT/GM-----|----1.5 (2nd)-----|
|----2.07 (53rd)----|-------Sacks/GM---------|----2.21(38th)---|
|---29.88 (64th)----|---Time of Poss/GM----|---29.52(77th)---|
-----------------------PFF GRADES----------------------------
I know PFF Grades don't mean much, but here they are...
| MSU |----PFF Grades----| UM |
| 5th |------Offense------| 7th |
|19th|-------Passing------|17th|
| 9th |---Pass-Blocking---|39th|
|18th|------Receiving-----| 6th |
| 2nd|-------Rushing------|75th|
| 4th |----Run-Blocking---|40th|
|13th|-------Defense------|40th|
|26th|----Rush Defense---|63rd|
|72nd|------Tackling-------|71st|
|42nd|-----Pass Rush------|65th|
|16th|------Coverage------|20th|
------------------------------------------INTERESTING HISTORICAL STATS--------------------------------------------
- Brent Vigen is 39-2 in Bozeman, winning 95% of his games at home (two OT losses, one to NDSU and one to SDSU)
- UM has one road playoff win in their history as a program (#1JMU in 2008 Semifinals)
- The Griz haven't won in Bozeman since 2015
- Hauck has not won in Bozeman since coming to UM from UNLV, those margins of victory for MSU were 34, 34, and 23
- Brent Vigen is 3-2 in Brawl Games (2 wins at home, 1 away)
- Bobby Hauck is 2-5 in Brawl Games in his second stint (2 wins at home, none away)
- Under Vigen, the Cats have played a team twice in a season on two occasions, sweeping both times (Idaho, Weber State - Both Home)
- Brent Vigen is 36-3 vs BigSky Opponents
Since many of you are prematurely calling this the "REAL" National Title Game, this information is relevant
- Brent Vigen is 0-2 in FCS National Championship Games with MSU as HC (2021, 2024)
- Brent Vigen is 3-0 in FCS National Championship Games with NDSU as OC (2011, 2012, 2013)
- Bobby Hauck is 0-3 in FCS National Championship Games with UM pre NDSU Dynasty Era (2004, 2008, 2009)
- Bobby Hauck is 0-1 in FCS National Championship Games with UM during NDSU Dynasty Era (2023)
- Brent Vigen is 3-2 overall in FCS National Championship Games with NDSU + MSU (OC + HC)
- Bobby Hauck is 0-4 overall in FCS National Championship Games with UM
------------------------------------------------------------CONCLUSION-------------------------------------------------------------
Take what you want from this... These stats clearly tell that MSU has had a tougher Strength of Schedule. This makes it even more impressive that MSU leads in almost every Team Stat category besides Passing Offense, Average Points Scored, and Receiving (YAC)... This points to a more explosive offense on the side of UM. MSU has statistically superior line play, scoring top 10 in both Pass Blocking and Run Blocking. UM gets to the QB for sacks at a higher rate, and also creates 0.5 more INTs a game than MSU does, but MSU has better pass rush rate PFF grades ranked 42nd while UM is 65th. MSU's rushing defense (#14) is also significantly better than UM's (#39th). Total Defensive ranking for UM is a shocking #86, while MSU's is #11.
MSU has controlled 3rd down this year on both sides of the ball, coming up with a stop 67% of the time(#13 in FCS) and converting 47% of the time (#10 in FCS).
MSU has a far superior Defense when it comes to yards allowed and points scored, allowing 68.5 fewer yards and 6.15 fewer points than UM. MSU has also outgained UM in total yards gained per game, gaining 30 more yards a game. This is also interesting considering UM averages 42.3 points scored per game, 4.9 more points per game than MSU. This means UM is more potent in the redzone, scoring more TDs than FGs. MSU sometimes sputters in the redzone where they have to kick more FGs, equaling less points per game despite more yards gained on average... (or maybe its Bobby running up the score
This was a fun little project to do. If anyone has anything to add to this, or has any input on these findings, please comment and post down below. I hope people found this as fascinating as I did.