OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Post Reply
User avatar
VimSince03
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10115
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 5:43 pm

OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by VimSince03 » Thu Oct 23, 2025 4:46 pm

This thread is for the Bobcat fans who have been told by Griz fans "there just aren't any big bodies in Montana to recruit anymore for the lines". This is a list of in-state talent that got recruited to either school since Hauck came back to UM on November 30, 2017. These players were recruited to either play on the OL or DL (DT/DE).

2018

Joe McElroy (Missoula Loyola) - Montana State
Trevor Welnel (Helena Capital) - Montana
Conor Quick (Helena Capital) - Montana

2019

Holden Sampson (Helena High) - Montana State
Garrison Poetzl (Billings Senior) - Montana
Marcus Wehr (Billings Central) - Montana State

2020

Henry Nuce (Kalispell Glacier) - Montana
Journey Grimsrud (Huntley Project) - Montana
Trey Yates (Colstrip) - Montana State
Conor Reitler (Billings Skyview) - Montana State
Aaron Richards (Butte Central) - Montana State

2021

Dylan Rollins (Missoula Sentinel) - BYU
Kenneth Eiden IV (Bozeman) - Montana State
Kellen Detrick (Havre) - Montana
Paul Brott (Billings West) - Montana State
Dylan Smith (Whitehall) - Montana
Sloan McPherson (Savage) - Montana
Zach Evans (Helena High) - Montana

2022

Zac Crews (Missoula Sentinel) - Montana
Burke Mastel (Red Lodge) - Montana State
Ethan Abbott (Florence) - Montana State
Tommy Nilson (Missoula Hellgate) - Montana State
Braunson Henriksen (Polson) - Montana

2023

Jacob Anderson (Billings West) - Oregon State
Talon Marsh (Helena Capital) - Montana State
Austin Buehler (Helena Capital) - Montana
Hunter Sharbono (Fairview) - Montana State
Everett Carr (Bozeman) - Montana State
Jaxon Tucker (Billings West) - Montana
Tate Templeton (Missoula Sentinel) - Montana
Jonathan Luhmann (Florence) - Montana State

2024

Hayden Hanks (Thompson Falls) - Boise State
Hudson Weins (Bozeman) - Montana State
Dalton Noble (Jefferson) - Montana State
Braden Zimmer (Billings West) - Montana State

2025

Ben Winters (Kalispell Glacier) - Montana State
Vaughn Wirkus (Kalispell Glacier) - Montana State
Blaine Downing (Malta) - Montana State

2026

Tommy Lewis (Havre) - Montana State
Derek Opitz (Helena Capital) - Montana
Maverick Diede (Kalispell Glacier) - Army
Brody Bullette (Polson) - Montana State
Lincoln Senter (CMR) - Montana

Final tallies:

OL recruits to MSU - 15 (Rollins went to BYU so not included here)
OL recruits to UM - 8

DL recruits to MSU - 8
DL recruits to UM - 8 (Crews was won by UM initially)

OL/DL recruits to FBS - 4

Starters or have received varsity minutes (not mop-up duty and Crews flips over to MSU for this report):

MSU (11) - McElroy, Sampson, Wehr, Eiden, Brott, Mastel, Crews, Marsh, Sharbono, Carr, Zimmer
UM (3) - Nuce, Grimsrud, Detrick

If you take out the 2025 and 2026 kids, hit rate so far since Hauck 2.0 on the "bigs" earning starter minutes: MSU is 11/18 for 61% while UM is 3/13 for 23%

I actually thought Hauck started strong by getting some good kids out of Capital that first year and Poetzl was my #2 recruit in the state in 2019. Nuce, Grimsrud, and Detrick where all Top 10 kids on my lists with Journey or Hank probably being the best player coming out of that crop. Trevor Welnel made a two-deep and Austin Buehler is on the current two-deep but that's about it with every recruited player up through 2024.

Getting Sampson and Wehr in 2019 were big wins for Choate though we really didn't know what we had in Wehr at that time. The in-state recruiting war on the lines really started to swing MSU in 2021 when they landed legacy players in Eiden and Brott. 2022 the Griz landed Crews which was a giant win prior to all his stuff going down but Burke was part of that class too along with current reserve Tommy Nilson. 2023 we got Marsh, Sharbono, and Carr and since then its arguably been a wipe-out for MSU over UM. No one really knew how quickly Braden Zimmer will develop but he's current our starting LT and isn't going to let go of the spot unless he gets hurt or gets plucked by a FBS school.

When it comes down to it, MSU has prioritized the OL and it shows in our in-state Montana production. The fact the Griz have only developed ONE in-state OL since Hauck 2.0 came back into the fold is pretty astonishing...and Journey was recruited as a DL like Wehr.
Last edited by VimSince03 on Sat Oct 25, 2025 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.


"There's two times of year for me: Football season, and waiting for football season."

NewEra
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 553
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 8:56 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by NewEra » Thu Oct 23, 2025 7:32 pm

This is a nightmare post for Andrew Schmidt! Who I didn’t know existed until colter brought him on his podcast, which shows how irrelevant he was when he played. All “joking” aside, what a stark contrast in the approach of how we have recruited compare to the griz. Skyline needs to even out the griz to Bobcat discussion, maybe they could have you on to discuss the in state recruiting.



nutman
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by nutman » Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm

So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?



User avatar
VimSince03
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10115
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 5:43 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by VimSince03 » Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm

nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.


"There's two times of year for me: Football season, and waiting for football season."

Catsrgrood
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1493
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2017 5:49 pm
Location: Billings

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by Catsrgrood » Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:27 pm

RTD though



User avatar
HelenaCat95
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 6976
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Helena, Montana

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by HelenaCat95 » Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:32 pm

VimSince03 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm
nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.
I agree with Vim that it's both. With an emphasis on development, and a HUGE part of that is Sean Herrin and his staff and program.
Edit: The Strength and Conditioning part of development is important to the whole program, but especially for the Oline and Dline. Also, if you go over the recent history of MSU's success as a program, what is the one constant from the Choate era through the Vigen era....it's Sean Herrin.
Last edited by HelenaCat95 on Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.



User avatar
wbtfg
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 14428
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 12:52 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by wbtfg » Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm

VimSince03 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm
nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.
Which is wild considering how strong Bobby and his staff were at developing guys during his first tenure.



nanacat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 2:14 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by nanacat » Fri Oct 24, 2025 7:37 pm

wbtfg wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm
VimSince03 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm
nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.
Which is wild considering how strong Bobby and his staff were at developing guys during his first tenure.
So what changed do you think?



110010110
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 263
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 9:19 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by 110010110 » Fri Oct 24, 2025 9:22 pm

nanacat wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 7:37 pm
wbtfg wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm
VimSince03 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm
nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.
Which is wild considering how strong Bobby and his staff were at developing guys during his first tenure.
So what changed do you think?
I have to wonder if the arrogant asshole head coach schtick doesn't have the same impact it did 20 years ago.



User avatar
coloradocat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 6426
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 8:24 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by coloradocat » Fri Oct 24, 2025 9:28 pm

110010110 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 9:22 pm
nanacat wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 7:37 pm
wbtfg wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm
VimSince03 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm
nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.
Which is wild considering how strong Bobby and his staff were at developing guys during his first tenure.
So what changed do you think?
I have to wonder if the arrogant asshole head coach schtick doesn't have the same impact it did 20 years ago.
Vigen mentioned in one of his interviews this week how today's players want to know the "why" when their coaches tell them to do something. I have a feeling this generation can see right through Bobbi and at some point, either before of after signing day, decide they don't have to put up with it.


Eastwood, did not make it. Ball out! Recovered, by Montana State!! The Bobcats hold!!! The Bobcats hold!!!

nanacat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 2:14 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by nanacat » Fri Oct 24, 2025 9:58 pm

coloradocat wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 9:28 pm
110010110 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 9:22 pm
nanacat wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 7:37 pm
wbtfg wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm
VimSince03 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm
nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.
Which is wild considering how strong Bobby and his staff were at developing guys during his first tenure.
So what changed do you think?
I have to wonder if the arrogant asshole head coach schtick doesn't have the same impact it did 20 years ago.
Vigen mentioned in one of his interviews this week how today's players want to know the "why" when their coaches tell them to do something. I have a feeling this generation can see right through Bobbi and at some point, either before of after signing day, decide they don't have to put up with it.
I'm sure that does play a role. Thing is, Bobby doesn't think he should have to give a why, and in some ways I do get that, but it sure seems he micromanages his players too. You never see them interviewed without him there, and I'm not sure I've ever seen any of them smile or laugh like the Cats players do when they're being interviewed. Not that its all about fun, but if they aren't enjoying being there, if they're not being developed, taught, etc, what's the point?



catscat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2177
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 4:13 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by catscat » Sat Oct 25, 2025 6:36 am

nanacat wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 7:37 pm
wbtfg wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm
VimSince03 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm
nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.
Which is wild considering how strong Bobby and his staff were at developing guys during his first tenure.
So what changed do you think?
First time around the griz had recent national championships which made it much easier to recruit talented or developable players. This time, not so much for a variety of reasons including hauck himself.


Can't make up my mind as to which is better - 55-21 or 48-14, but 34-11 will do.

nanacat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2389
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2019 2:14 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by nanacat » Sat Oct 25, 2025 7:55 am

catscat wrote:
Sat Oct 25, 2025 6:36 am
nanacat wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 7:37 pm
wbtfg wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm
VimSince03 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm
nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.
Which is wild considering how strong Bobby and his staff were at developing guys during his first tenure.
So what changed do you think?
First time around the griz had recent national championships which made it much easier to recruit talented or developable players. This time, not so much for a variety of reasons including hauck himself.
Yup, I can see that too. Honestly I'm amazed that Montana high school students still want to go there.



User avatar
WeedKillinCat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2025
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2005 7:19 pm
Location: Billings Heights

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by WeedKillinCat » Sat Oct 25, 2025 9:52 am

The thing that I've been watching is how much playing time our in state players are getting vs the gris. I feel sorry for in state kids that commit to them only to fizzle out or not get a chance because of how much they use the portal.


1993 Agronomy
If You Want To Get To Heaven-----You Gotta Raise A Little Hell

nutman
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 113
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 4:52 pm

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by nutman » Sat Oct 25, 2025 10:14 am

Colter stated on Tootel and Nuanez that he thinks one of their OL players would start for the Cats. The round robin of players and lack of consistency from year to year look to be primary to their issue. However, we’ve had our own attrition from both players and new coaches. Doesn’t seem to matter. There is always a guy who is ready to go in the wings. As a business owner, I wish I knew more about how they achieve this so consistently.



User avatar
Helcat72
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4486
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 9:47 pm
Location: Helena

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by Helcat72 » Sat Oct 25, 2025 12:46 pm

I think Bobby only recruits OL that are already 6'6" and over 300 lbs. He doesn't want to wait 2 years to develop them. Vigen seems to recruit potential OL that are 6'4" and have good mobility and all around athleticism. Then he has em gain strength and "good" weight until they are in the 290 range.

What results for Bobby are a bunch of huge behemoths that can't block anyone on the second level. So Gilman gets tackled for no gain on 50% of his runs. He's good enough to spring himself on long runs in spite of his OL.


2024 Resume dominance

User avatar
Go Scats Go
Member # Retired
Posts: 2076
Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 10:24 pm
Location: MT

Re: OL/DL In-State Recruits - Start of Hauck 2.0

Post by Go Scats Go » Sun Oct 26, 2025 2:51 pm

nanacat wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 7:37 pm
wbtfg wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:36 pm
VimSince03 wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:23 pm
nutman wrote:
Fri Oct 24, 2025 3:05 pm
So the numbers overall sway in the Cats direction, but impact radically swings to the Cats. Anyone have thoughts about whether this is a player development issue or just the he fact that we are recruiting the ones that can contribute better than the Pandaz?
Emphatically both.
Which is wild considering how strong Bobby and his staff were at developing guys during his first tenure.
So what changed do you think?
The transfer pool


CelticCat wrote:Well it's because the Griz are the only program in Montana of course.

Post Reply