Wood in portal
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- catatac
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8930
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:37 pm
Re: Wood in portal
I have a question for the folks that think a players odds go up significantly if they play in the FBS. If Troy Andersen has a goal of playing in the NFL, would you recommend to him that he should leave MSU and try to get to a bigger school?
Great time to be a BOBCAT!
- catsrback76
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 11:18 am
- Location: Sitting on the hill looking at the Adriatic!
Re: Wood in portal
Nope, play where you feel comfortable. He's on everyone's radar as a prospect...doesn't matter 1 bit that he's living in Bozeman. Now, onto the next subject!
Congrats Connor, hope you do well!
- Montanabob
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3736
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:29 pm
- Location: Two Dot
Re: Wood in portal
Can an admin lock this thread. I'm tired of the crap people are putting on this post
MSU fan.... U of I Graduate... They're Back
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4415
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:11 am
Re: Wood in portal
I really don’t want to get into this again, but I was then and still am friends with D and a lot of other players on the football team. There were problems related to what I talked about. You don’t have to believe me, I don’t care. Ask Vim, he probably knows too.PapaG wrote: ↑Thu Jun 17, 2021 9:15 pmHave you ever been offered a job when you were young, made all of your quotas/benchmarks, excelled in all ways, and then left for what you perceive to be a better opportunity when management changed?
If so, you’re being completely hypocritical. Or maybe you’ve stayed at the same job your entire life, which is admirable but to me, the sign of a lack of ambition to better your career.
PS
Had to liven this places up a bit. Going from the Big Sky to the SEC is like leaving your first job at a small tech company for more money at Google or Microsoft. I never get the resentment when players who graduated, especially during a coaching change, try to improve their career.
Seems small-town to me in a way. Some people like to experience other opportunities, even if it means leaving small programs in small states or small companies for larger companies. I remember back when you were blaming McGhee for being a Pike and supposedly a bad influence in the locker room. That was unreal.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6509
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:12 pm
Re: Wood in portal
Funny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
- BleedingBLue
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm
Re: Wood in portal
This isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
- mslacatfan
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 1:44 pm
Re: Wood in portal
BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
FTG- GO CATS GO!
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6509
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:12 pm
Re: Wood in portal
They’re not ridiculous in the context of this conversation. Regardless of playing time, starting or not starting, leaving for education or a shot at the NFL. Doesn’t matter. The fact remains kids are going to do what they think is best for them. And as a fanbase we’re all about that decision when a kid thinks what’s best for him is coming to MSU. When that decision is leaving MSU, suddenly he is selfish, not a team player and a “snowflake”.mslacatfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:24 pmBleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
No big deal. Not worth me arguing as I’ll have the kids back in this 100 of 100 times.
- PapaG
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 8549
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:44 am
- Location: The Magic City, MT
Re: Wood in portal
So it only matters when players who are getting playing time leave. The bench players don’t matter when they abandon their teammates and commitment to a university because ... why? As for transfers into the program, they are taking playing time away from current players on the roster who are loyal. That apparently doesn’t matter to you, it’s all about the best players and if someone like Rovig loses his spot to a transfer like McKay, welp, those are the breaks, kiddo. Good luck and we’re pulling your scholarship money so you may want to look elsewhere in many instances.mslacatfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:24 pmBleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
Really tells me all I need to know. Good players should be obligated to stay for their teammates, bench players, good riddance if someone better transfers into the program! Hilariously inconsistent.
My opinion is the same as @ilovethecats and always has been. I back whatever the student-athlete wants to do, it’s their life and dumping on a 19-22 year-old for pursuing different opportunities seems immature to me as an adult who has transferred colleges when I was 18 and jobs after college.
Seattle to Billings to Missoula to Bozeman to Portland to Billings
What a ride
What a ride
- BleedingBLue
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm
Re: Wood in portal
Your posts go so far to the extreme of one side all the time it's comical. Nobody had said anything about not being bummed about bench or depth players leaving. If anything it's more understandable for them because they want to play. And name a guy who came in, won a starting job and forced a former starter to lose his scholarship as you outlined above with the McKay and Rovig scenario. Whether Rovig starts or not he isn't losing his scholarship.PapaG wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:54 pmSo it only matters when players who are getting playing time leave. The bench players don’t matter when they abandon their teammates and commitment to a university because ... why? As for transfers into the program, they are taking playing time away from current players on the roster who are loyal. That apparently doesn’t matter to you, it’s all about the best players and if someone like Rovig loses his spot to a transfer like McKay, welp, those are the breaks, kiddo. Good luck and we’re pulling your scholarship money so you may want to look elsewhere in many instances.mslacatfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:24 pmBleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
Really tells me all I need to know. Good players should be obligated to stay for their teammates, bench players, good riddance if someone better transfers into the program! Hilariously inconsistent.
My opinion is the same as @ilovethecats and always has been. I back whatever the student-athlete wants to do, it’s their life and dumping on a 19-22 year-old for pursuing different opportunities seems immature to me as an adult who has transferred colleges when I was 18 and jobs after college.
Neither myself or mslacatfan were dumping on anyone. In general no dumping has been done in this thread. People have voiced their opinion on the topic both for and against this. If you think players transferring in who were getting no playing time at their former school is comparable to a starter here transferring out to go to a FBS school is the same, you're wrong.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6509
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:12 pm
Re: Wood in portal
Obviously I don’t think he’s wrong at all. It’s just what criteria fans use to determine if a transfer is “legit” or “fair” instead of giving up on teammates.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:50 pmYour posts go so far to the extreme of one side all the time it's comical. Nobody had said anything about not being bummed about bench or depth players leaving. If anything it's more understandable for them because they want to play. And name a guy who came in, won a starting job and forced a former starter to lose his scholarship as you outlined above with the McKay and Rovig scenario. Whether Rovig starts or not he isn't losing his scholarship.PapaG wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:54 pmSo it only matters when players who are getting playing time leave. The bench players don’t matter when they abandon their teammates and commitment to a university because ... why? As for transfers into the program, they are taking playing time away from current players on the roster who are loyal. That apparently doesn’t matter to you, it’s all about the best players and if someone like Rovig loses his spot to a transfer like McKay, welp, those are the breaks, kiddo. Good luck and we’re pulling your scholarship money so you may want to look elsewhere in many instances.mslacatfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:24 pmBleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
Really tells me all I need to know. Good players should be obligated to stay for their teammates, bench players, good riddance if someone better transfers into the program! Hilariously inconsistent.
My opinion is the same as @ilovethecats and always has been. I back whatever the student-athlete wants to do, it’s their life and dumping on a 19-22 year-old for pursuing different opportunities seems immature to me as an adult who has transferred colleges when I was 18 and jobs after college.
Neither myself or mslacatfan were dumping on anyone. In general no dumping has been done in this thread. People have voiced their opinion on the topic both for and against this. If you think players transferring in who were getting no playing time at their former school is comparable to a starter here transferring out to go to a FBS school is the same, you're wrong.
Our football team and basketball teams have gotten many players over the years from lower divisions and jucos that were starters on their team before “abandoning” their teams to take a stab at a higher level. We love giving those guys and I can’t recall ever not wanting one of them because they quit on their teams.
You have your criteria on what you deem to be correct in regards to these players and other fans have different criteria. I don’t see how one opinion is wrong and one is right?
- BleedingBLue
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6185
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:00 pm
Re: Wood in portal
It's not an opinion that guys transferring in to actually see the field is different than a starter transferring out to play at a higher level. It's a fact that those transfers are happening for different reasons, at least football wise anyway. One is transferring to get playing time, the other is transferring from a place where he played every down to a higher level for whatever his reason may be. Two different things.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 6:36 amObviously I don’t think he’s wrong at all. It’s just what criteria fans use to determine if a transfer is “legit” or “fair” instead of giving up on teammates.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:50 pmYour posts go so far to the extreme of one side all the time it's comical. Nobody had said anything about not being bummed about bench or depth players leaving. If anything it's more understandable for them because they want to play. And name a guy who came in, won a starting job and forced a former starter to lose his scholarship as you outlined above with the McKay and Rovig scenario. Whether Rovig starts or not he isn't losing his scholarship.PapaG wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:54 pmSo it only matters when players who are getting playing time leave. The bench players don’t matter when they abandon their teammates and commitment to a university because ... why? As for transfers into the program, they are taking playing time away from current players on the roster who are loyal. That apparently doesn’t matter to you, it’s all about the best players and if someone like Rovig loses his spot to a transfer like McKay, welp, those are the breaks, kiddo. Good luck and we’re pulling your scholarship money so you may want to look elsewhere in many instances.mslacatfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:24 pmBleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
Really tells me all I need to know. Good players should be obligated to stay for their teammates, bench players, good riddance if someone better transfers into the program! Hilariously inconsistent.
My opinion is the same as @ilovethecats and always has been. I back whatever the student-athlete wants to do, it’s their life and dumping on a 19-22 year-old for pursuing different opportunities seems immature to me as an adult who has transferred colleges when I was 18 and jobs after college.
Neither myself or mslacatfan were dumping on anyone. In general no dumping has been done in this thread. People have voiced their opinion on the topic both for and against this. If you think players transferring in who were getting no playing time at their former school is comparable to a starter here transferring out to go to a FBS school is the same, you're wrong.
Our football team and basketball teams have gotten many players over the years from lower divisions and jucos that were starters on their team before “abandoning” their teams to take a stab at a higher level. We love giving those guys and I can’t recall ever not wanting one of them because they quit on their teams.
You have your criteria on what you deem to be correct in regards to these players and other fans have different criteria. I don’t see how one opinion is wrong and one is right?
I've always hated transfer rules where a guy is allowed to move on and immediately play. Is it great when it works out in our favor? Definitely, but I still hate the rule. I don't fault Connor one bit for leaving, especially since he graduated and he's well within the rules. I understand that young men sometimes go "crap this isn't where I want to be" and need a change. But in general these days transfers are happening because a guy didn't win a starting job as a freshman, maybe a sophomore, or coach brought in competition for him when he's an upper classman. When it happens at the same level that really bugs me. Like Justin Fields leaving Georgia because he was mad he didn't start freshman year.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4415
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:11 am
Re: Wood in portal
Most Juco’s are two year schools. They’re designed to move on from, that’s the whole idea. Poor example.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 6:36 amObviously I don’t think he’s wrong at all. It’s just what criteria fans use to determine if a transfer is “legit” or “fair” instead of giving up on teammates.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:50 pmYour posts go so far to the extreme of one side all the time it's comical. Nobody had said anything about not being bummed about bench or depth players leaving. If anything it's more understandable for them because they want to play. And name a guy who came in, won a starting job and forced a former starter to lose his scholarship as you outlined above with the McKay and Rovig scenario. Whether Rovig starts or not he isn't losing his scholarship.PapaG wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:54 pmSo it only matters when players who are getting playing time leave. The bench players don’t matter when they abandon their teammates and commitment to a university because ... why? As for transfers into the program, they are taking playing time away from current players on the roster who are loyal. That apparently doesn’t matter to you, it’s all about the best players and if someone like Rovig loses his spot to a transfer like McKay, welp, those are the breaks, kiddo. Good luck and we’re pulling your scholarship money so you may want to look elsewhere in many instances.mslacatfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:24 pmBleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
Really tells me all I need to know. Good players should be obligated to stay for their teammates, bench players, good riddance if someone better transfers into the program! Hilariously inconsistent.
My opinion is the same as @ilovethecats and always has been. I back whatever the student-athlete wants to do, it’s their life and dumping on a 19-22 year-old for pursuing different opportunities seems immature to me as an adult who has transferred colleges when I was 18 and jobs after college.
Neither myself or mslacatfan were dumping on anyone. In general no dumping has been done in this thread. People have voiced their opinion on the topic both for and against this. If you think players transferring in who were getting no playing time at their former school is comparable to a starter here transferring out to go to a FBS school is the same, you're wrong.
Our football team and basketball teams have gotten many players over the years from lower divisions and jucos that were starters on their team before “abandoning” their teams to take a stab at a higher level. We love giving those guys and I can’t recall ever not wanting one of them because they quit on their teams.
You have your criteria on what you deem to be correct in regards to these players and other fans have different criteria. I don’t see how one opinion is wrong and one is right?
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6509
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:12 pm
Re: Wood in portal
Justin fields transferring seemed to work very well for him. And the team he transferred to I guess to a lesser extent. Good for him and any student who makes a move athletically or academically to better himself.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:54 amIt's not an opinion that guys transferring in to actually see the field is different than a starter transferring out to play at a higher level. It's a fact that those transfers are happening for different reasons, at least football wise anyway. One is transferring to get playing time, the other is transferring from a place where he played every down to a higher level for whatever his reason may be. Two different things.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 6:36 amObviously I don’t think he’s wrong at all. It’s just what criteria fans use to determine if a transfer is “legit” or “fair” instead of giving up on teammates.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:50 pmYour posts go so far to the extreme of one side all the time it's comical. Nobody had said anything about not being bummed about bench or depth players leaving. If anything it's more understandable for them because they want to play. And name a guy who came in, won a starting job and forced a former starter to lose his scholarship as you outlined above with the McKay and Rovig scenario. Whether Rovig starts or not he isn't losing his scholarship.PapaG wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:54 pmSo it only matters when players who are getting playing time leave. The bench players don’t matter when they abandon their teammates and commitment to a university because ... why? As for transfers into the program, they are taking playing time away from current players on the roster who are loyal. That apparently doesn’t matter to you, it’s all about the best players and if someone like Rovig loses his spot to a transfer like McKay, welp, those are the breaks, kiddo. Good luck and we’re pulling your scholarship money so you may want to look elsewhere in many instances.mslacatfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:24 pmBleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
Really tells me all I need to know. Good players should be obligated to stay for their teammates, bench players, good riddance if someone better transfers into the program! Hilariously inconsistent.
My opinion is the same as @ilovethecats and always has been. I back whatever the student-athlete wants to do, it’s their life and dumping on a 19-22 year-old for pursuing different opportunities seems immature to me as an adult who has transferred colleges when I was 18 and jobs after college.
Neither myself or mslacatfan were dumping on anyone. In general no dumping has been done in this thread. People have voiced their opinion on the topic both for and against this. If you think players transferring in who were getting no playing time at their former school is comparable to a starter here transferring out to go to a FBS school is the same, you're wrong.
Our football team and basketball teams have gotten many players over the years from lower divisions and jucos that were starters on their team before “abandoning” their teams to take a stab at a higher level. We love giving those guys and I can’t recall ever not wanting one of them because they quit on their teams.
You have your criteria on what you deem to be correct in regards to these players and other fans have different criteria. I don’t see how one opinion is wrong and one is right?
I've always hated transfer rules where a guy is allowed to move on and immediately play. Is it great when it works out in our favor? Definitely, but I still hate the rule. I don't fault Connor one bit for leaving, especially since he graduated and he's well within the rules. I understand that young men sometimes go "crap this isn't where I want to be" and need a change. But in general these days transfers are happening because a guy didn't win a starting job as a freshman, maybe a sophomore, or coach brought in competition for him when he's an upper classman. When it happens at the same level that really bugs me. Like Justin Fields leaving Georgia because he was mad he didn't start freshman year.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6509
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:12 pm
Re: Wood in portal
That’s fair. Doesn’t change my opinion a bit. I love when we get transfers that will help our team. I don’t question why they transferred, nor do I care. When we lose a kid the same way, I may not love it for selfish reasons, but don’t have an issue with it. I’m completely fine with any college student doing whatever they think is best for them personally, and their future.bobcat99 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:04 amMost Juco’s are two year schools. They’re designed to move on from, that’s the whole idea. Poor example.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 6:36 amObviously I don’t think he’s wrong at all. It’s just what criteria fans use to determine if a transfer is “legit” or “fair” instead of giving up on teammates.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:50 pmYour posts go so far to the extreme of one side all the time it's comical. Nobody had said anything about not being bummed about bench or depth players leaving. If anything it's more understandable for them because they want to play. And name a guy who came in, won a starting job and forced a former starter to lose his scholarship as you outlined above with the McKay and Rovig scenario. Whether Rovig starts or not he isn't losing his scholarship.PapaG wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:54 pmSo it only matters when players who are getting playing time leave. The bench players don’t matter when they abandon their teammates and commitment to a university because ... why? As for transfers into the program, they are taking playing time away from current players on the roster who are loyal. That apparently doesn’t matter to you, it’s all about the best players and if someone like Rovig loses his spot to a transfer like McKay, welp, those are the breaks, kiddo. Good luck and we’re pulling your scholarship money so you may want to look elsewhere in many instances.mslacatfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:24 pmBleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
Really tells me all I need to know. Good players should be obligated to stay for their teammates, bench players, good riddance if someone better transfers into the program! Hilariously inconsistent.
My opinion is the same as @ilovethecats and always has been. I back whatever the student-athlete wants to do, it’s their life and dumping on a 19-22 year-old for pursuing different opportunities seems immature to me as an adult who has transferred colleges when I was 18 and jobs after college.
Neither myself or mslacatfan were dumping on anyone. In general no dumping has been done in this thread. People have voiced their opinion on the topic both for and against this. If you think players transferring in who were getting no playing time at their former school is comparable to a starter here transferring out to go to a FBS school is the same, you're wrong.
Our football team and basketball teams have gotten many players over the years from lower divisions and jucos that were starters on their team before “abandoning” their teams to take a stab at a higher level. We love giving those guys and I can’t recall ever not wanting one of them because they quit on their teams.
You have your criteria on what you deem to be correct in regards to these players and other fans have different criteria. I don’t see how one opinion is wrong and one is right?
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4415
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:11 am
Re: Wood in portal
So I know you’ve been addressing more people than me, so I’d just like to clarify my position a little.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 8:30 pmThat’s fair. Doesn’t change my opinion a bit. I love when we get transfers that will help our team. I don’t question why they transferred, nor do I care. When we lose a kid the same way, I may not love it for selfish reasons, but don’t have an issue with it. I’m completely fine with any college student doing whatever they think is best for them personally, and their future.bobcat99 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:04 amMost Juco’s are two year schools. They’re designed to move on from, that’s the whole idea. Poor example.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 6:36 amObviously I don’t think he’s wrong at all. It’s just what criteria fans use to determine if a transfer is “legit” or “fair” instead of giving up on teammates.BleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 5:50 pmYour posts go so far to the extreme of one side all the time it's comical. Nobody had said anything about not being bummed about bench or depth players leaving. If anything it's more understandable for them because they want to play. And name a guy who came in, won a starting job and forced a former starter to lose his scholarship as you outlined above with the McKay and Rovig scenario. Whether Rovig starts or not he isn't losing his scholarship.PapaG wrote: ↑Sun Jun 20, 2021 4:54 pmSo it only matters when players who are getting playing time leave. The bench players don’t matter when they abandon their teammates and commitment to a university because ... why? As for transfers into the program, they are taking playing time away from current players on the roster who are loyal. That apparently doesn’t matter to you, it’s all about the best players and if someone like Rovig loses his spot to a transfer like McKay, welp, those are the breaks, kiddo. Good luck and we’re pulling your scholarship money so you may want to look elsewhere in many instances.mslacatfan wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 8:24 pmBleedingBLue wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 6:40 pmThis isn't the first time this has been said in this thread.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 5:58 pmFunny how that works huh? I’d go a step farther and say I don’t recall a single time anyone voiced any displeasure with someone who transferred to MSU. Seems odd….
It's not the same thing. Those guys transferring in aren't leaving starting spots to come play for MSU. Sterk was never going to see the field at UW. Neither was Amandre. Jonsen went to a JC first I believe and never would have played a snap at Oregon, at least not at QB. Sandland played sparingly at Miami. Alleyene wasn't starting at VT. The list goes on and on.
To be clear I love having transfers come in and succeed and I hate seeing our best guys leave. I'm simply saying the above because it's a silly comparison.
Thank you!!! The comparisons are ridiculous.
Really tells me all I need to know. Good players should be obligated to stay for their teammates, bench players, good riddance if someone better transfers into the program! Hilariously inconsistent.
My opinion is the same as @ilovethecats and always has been. I back whatever the student-athlete wants to do, it’s their life and dumping on a 19-22 year-old for pursuing different opportunities seems immature to me as an adult who has transferred colleges when I was 18 and jobs after college.
Neither myself or mslacatfan were dumping on anyone. In general no dumping has been done in this thread. People have voiced their opinion on the topic both for and against this. If you think players transferring in who were getting no playing time at their former school is comparable to a starter here transferring out to go to a FBS school is the same, you're wrong.
Our football team and basketball teams have gotten many players over the years from lower divisions and jucos that were starters on their team before “abandoning” their teams to take a stab at a higher level. We love giving those guys and I can’t recall ever not wanting one of them because they quit on their teams.
You have your criteria on what you deem to be correct in regards to these players and other fans have different criteria. I don’t see how one opinion is wrong and one is right?
I really have no issue with transferring. I do believe that someone transferring to hopefully get more playing time is different than a starter transferring. That’s apples to oranges in my mind. I whole heartedly believe in the right to transfer, but that doesn’t mean I always agree with the logic of it.
The whole point of this transfer in particular is about improving the chance at playing in the NFL. There is only one instance where I believe that can be correct, and that is that Wood will be playing against significantly better players in practice and games. As far as attention from scouts and what not, I don’t think it will make a significant difference. Sure, Missouri probably gets more scouts on a week to week basis, but MSU gets them too, and as we have seen time after time, if you’re good enough, they’ll find you. A D3 center just got drafted highly after not even playing a senior season. If you got the talent, chances are, they’ll see you.
So, in short, my problem isn’t with the transfer rules, it isn’t about the fairness, what’s right or wrong, I just really don’t agree with the logic of it. Am I right? Maybe. Maybe not. It’s just my opinion.
- CelticCat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 12215
- Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:55 pm
- Location: Upper Northwest WA
- Contact:
Re: Wood in portal
Are we going to have this argument every single time a significant player transfers out of MSU?
R&R Cat Cast - the only Bobcat fan podcast - https://www.rrcatcast.com
Twitter - https://twitter.com/rrcatcast
Twitter - https://twitter.com/rrcatcast
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4415
- Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 1:11 am
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7463
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:05 am
Re: Wood in portal
The main thing I got from this short article is that Purdue has picked up seven kids via the portal. I think this speaks well to kids looking at decent schools and thinking they can help turn around a program in a hurry.
https://saturdaytradition-com.cdn.amppr ... a-state%2F
https://saturdaytradition-com.cdn.amppr ... a-state%2F
- AFCAT
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 9170
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:25 pm
Re: Wood in portal
QB Club https://www.msubqc.org
Bobcat Collective https://linktr.ee/thebobcatcollective
“In the military, they teach you the best time to attack your enemy is nighttime and bad weather. We’ve got f—ing both!” — Devin Slaughter
Bobcat Collective https://linktr.ee/thebobcatcollective
“In the military, they teach you the best time to attack your enemy is nighttime and bad weather. We’ve got f—ing both!” — Devin Slaughter