Just like eGriz
Posted: Sun Nov 24, 2013 1:17 pm
Oh, beats me. Maybe the final outcome?The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
Oh, beats me. Maybe the final outcome?The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
No they wouldn't. Besides, NAU didn't have a better league record anyway. They played weaker competition.PapaG wrote:Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
In terms of playoff seeding, though, you can only count GRI/SOS/polls/playing a D2 team and beating them to get to 10 wins (versus only 9 for NAU in 11 games).
Everything but head-to-head, and conference record, apparently, count for the Griz versus the Lumberjacks. Of course, if the roles were reversed, I'm sure UM fans would be screaming bloody murder if they had beaten NAU 34-16, had a better league record, and the same amount of losses, yet NAU got the seed, and the Griz had to play next weekend.
tampa_griz wrote:No they wouldn't. Besides, NAU didn't have a better league record anyway. They played weaker competition.PapaG wrote:Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
In terms of playoff seeding, though, you can only count GRI/SOS/polls/playing a D2 team and beating them to get to 10 wins (versus only 9 for NAU in 11 games).
Everything but head-to-head, and conference record, apparently, count for the Griz versus the Lumberjacks. Of course, if the roles were reversed, I'm sure UM fans would be screaming bloody murder if they had beaten NAU 34-16, had a better league record, and the same amount of losses, yet NAU got the seed, and the Griz had to play next weekend.
No, you're dumb. They're different records against different teams.RationalGriz wrote:Are you dumb? 7-1 is better than 6-2 in my book.tampa_griz wrote:No they wouldn't. Besides, NAU didn't have a better league record anyway. They played weaker competition.PapaG wrote:Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
In terms of playoff seeding, though, you can only count GRI/SOS/polls/playing a D2 team and beating them to get to 10 wins (versus only 9 for NAU in 11 games).
Everything but head-to-head, and conference record, apparently, count for the Griz versus the Lumberjacks. Of course, if the roles were reversed, I'm sure UM fans would be screaming bloody murder if they had beaten NAU 34-16, had a better league record, and the same amount of losses, yet NAU got the seed, and the Griz had to play next weekend.
OK Stupid. They are the league records, whether or not they played the same league teams is irrelevant. If you want to whine about which teams each did play, go ahead, but by the rule of the BSC, it doesn't mean jack. No wonder people hate most Griz fans, they are complete and total whiny jackasses. All this does not even take into account that UM lost to NAU.tampa_griz wrote:No, you're dumb. They're different records against different teams.RationalGriz wrote:Are you dumb? 7-1 is better than 6-2 in my book.tampa_griz wrote:No they wouldn't. Besides, NAU didn't have a better league record anyway. They played weaker competition.PapaG wrote:Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
In terms of playoff seeding, though, you can only count GRI/SOS/polls/playing a D2 team and beating them to get to 10 wins (versus only 9 for NAU in 11 games).
Everything but head-to-head, and conference record, apparently, count for the Griz versus the Lumberjacks. Of course, if the roles were reversed, I'm sure UM fans would be screaming bloody murder if they had beaten NAU 34-16, had a better league record, and the same amount of losses, yet NAU got the seed, and the Griz had to play next weekend.
Why are you sad at me?RationalGriz wrote:OK Stupid. They are the league records, whether or not they played the same league teams is irrelevant. If you want to whine about which teams each did play, go ahead, but by the rule of the BSC, it doesn't mean jack. No wonder people hate most Griz fans, they are complete and total whiny jackasses. All this does not even take into account that UM lost to NAU.tampa_griz wrote:No, you're dumb. They're different records against different teams.RationalGriz wrote:Are you dumb? 7-1 is better than 6-2 in my book.tampa_griz wrote:No they wouldn't. Besides, NAU didn't have a better league record anyway. They played weaker competition.PapaG wrote:Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
In terms of playoff seeding, though, you can only count GRI/SOS/polls/playing a D2 team and beating them to get to 10 wins (versus only 9 for NAU in 11 games).
Everything but head-to-head, and conference record, apparently, count for the Griz versus the Lumberjacks. Of course, if the roles were reversed, I'm sure UM fans would be screaming bloody murder if they had beaten NAU 34-16, had a better league record, and the same amount of losses, yet NAU got the seed, and the Griz had to play next weekend.
I'm not...just called you out for a dumb argumenttampa_griz wrote:Why are you sad at me?RationalGriz wrote:OK Stupid. They are the league records, whether or not they played the same league teams is irrelevant. If you want to whine about which teams each did play, go ahead, but by the rule of the BSC, it doesn't mean jack. No wonder people hate most Griz fans, they are complete and total whiny jackasses. All this does not even take into account that UM lost to NAU.tampa_griz wrote:No, you're dumb. They're different records against different teams.RationalGriz wrote:Are you dumb? 7-1 is better than 6-2 in my book.tampa_griz wrote:No they wouldn't. Besides, NAU didn't have a better league record anyway. They played weaker competition.PapaG wrote:Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
In terms of playoff seeding, though, you can only count GRI/SOS/polls/playing a D2 team and beating them to get to 10 wins (versus only 9 for NAU in 11 games).
Everything but head-to-head, and conference record, apparently, count for the Griz versus the Lumberjacks. Of course, if the roles were reversed, I'm sure UM fans would be screaming bloody murder if they had beaten NAU 34-16, had a better league record, and the same amount of losses, yet NAU got the seed, and the Griz had to play next weekend.
But you're so upset with me? Why are you attacking me personally?RationalGriz wrote:I'm not...just called you out for a dumb argumenttampa_griz wrote:Why are you sad at me?RationalGriz wrote:OK Stupid. They are the league records, whether or not they played the same league teams is irrelevant. If you want to whine about which teams each did play, go ahead, but by the rule of the BSC, it doesn't mean jack. No wonder people hate most Griz fans, they are complete and total whiny jackasses. All this does not even take into account that UM lost to NAU.tampa_griz wrote:No, you're dumb. They're different records against different teams.RationalGriz wrote:Are you dumb? 7-1 is better than 6-2 in my book.tampa_griz wrote:No they wouldn't. Besides, NAU didn't have a better league record anyway. They played weaker competition.PapaG wrote:Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
In terms of playoff seeding, though, you can only count GRI/SOS/polls/playing a D2 team and beating them to get to 10 wins (versus only 9 for NAU in 11 games).
Everything but head-to-head, and conference record, apparently, count for the Griz versus the Lumberjacks. Of course, if the roles were reversed, I'm sure UM fans would be screaming bloody murder if they had beaten NAU 34-16, had a better league record, and the same amount of losses, yet NAU got the seed, and the Griz had to play next weekend.
I asked if you were dumb...did not call you dumb. You then did call me dumb, so I responded by calling you stupid. Seems you called me names first. And I still believe your argument is dumb.tampa_griz wrote:But you're so upset with me? Why are you attacking me personally?RationalGriz wrote:I'm not...just called you out for a dumb argumenttampa_griz wrote:Why are you sad at me?RationalGriz wrote:OK Stupid. They are the league records, whether or not they played the same league teams is irrelevant. If you want to whine about which teams each did play, go ahead, but by the rule of the BSC, it doesn't mean jack. No wonder people hate most Griz fans, they are complete and total whiny jackasses. All this does not even take into account that UM lost to NAU.tampa_griz wrote:No, you're dumb. They're different records against different teams.RationalGriz wrote:Are you dumb? 7-1 is better than 6-2 in my book.tampa_griz wrote:No they wouldn't. Besides, NAU didn't have a better league record anyway. They played weaker competition.PapaG wrote:Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
In terms of playoff seeding, though, you can only count GRI/SOS/polls/playing a D2 team and beating them to get to 10 wins (versus only 9 for NAU in 11 games).
Everything but head-to-head, and conference record, apparently, count for the Griz versus the Lumberjacks. Of course, if the roles were reversed, I'm sure UM fans would be screaming bloody murder if they had beaten NAU 34-16, had a better league record, and the same amount of losses, yet NAU got the seed, and the Griz had to play next weekend.
That's not a question. That's an accusation. Why are you doing that?RationalGriz wrote:I asked if you were dumb...did not call you dumb. You then did call me dumb, so I responded by calling you stupid. Seems you called me names first. And I still believe your argument is dumb.tampa_griz wrote:But you're so upset with me? Why are you attacking me personally?RationalGriz wrote:I'm not...just called you out for a dumb argumenttampa_griz wrote:Why are you sad at me?RationalGriz wrote:OK Stupid. They are the league records, whether or not they played the same league teams is irrelevant. If you want to whine about which teams each did play, go ahead, but by the rule of the BSC, it doesn't mean jack. No wonder people hate most Griz fans, they are complete and total whiny jackasses. All this does not even take into account that UM lost to NAU.tampa_griz wrote:No, you're dumb. They're different records against different teams.RationalGriz wrote:Are you dumb? 7-1 is better than 6-2 in my book.tampa_griz wrote:No they wouldn't. Besides, NAU didn't have a better league record anyway. They played weaker competition.PapaG wrote:Head-to-head, of course.The Butcher wrote:So now that the Cats KILLED NAU- how are the griz fans going to tell us how they have a better team?
In terms of playoff seeding, though, you can only count GRI/SOS/polls/playing a D2 team and beating them to get to 10 wins (versus only 9 for NAU in 11 games).
Everything but head-to-head, and conference record, apparently, count for the Griz versus the Lumberjacks. Of course, if the roles were reversed, I'm sure UM fans would be screaming bloody murder if they had beaten NAU 34-16, had a better league record, and the same amount of losses, yet NAU got the seed, and the Griz had to play next weekend.
Who's to say UM wouldn't have lost to SUU if they would have had to play them.Grizlaw wrote:Why should the selection committee care about league records, when they include non-common opponents? They should be comparing the teams' overall resumes. League records are meaningless, except to the extent that they include games against common opponents. The only reason NAU's league record is better than UM's is because they didn't have to play EWU.
Oh, I think it is pretty clear that UM's passing game is to say that UM wouldn't have lost to SUU. I think Johnson would have thrown for more than 90 yards over four quarters.Bobcat Jim wrote:Who's to say UM wouldn't have lost to SUU if they would have had to play them.Grizlaw wrote:Why should the selection committee care about league records, when they include non-common opponents? They should be comparing the teams' overall resumes. League records are meaningless, except to the extent that they include games against common opponents. The only reason NAU's league record is better than UM's is because they didn't have to play EWU.
Yeah, it's always the best case scenario with you guys.Griznationalist wrote:Oh, I think it is pretty clear that UM's passing game is to say that UM wouldn't have lost to SUU. I think Johnson would have thrown for more than 90 yards over four quarters.Bobcat Jim wrote:Who's to say UM wouldn't have lost to SUU if they would have had to play them.Grizlaw wrote:Why should the selection committee care about league records, when they include non-common opponents? They should be comparing the teams' overall resumes. League records are meaningless, except to the extent that they include games against common opponents. The only reason NAU's league record is better than UM's is because they didn't have to play EWU.