Page 1 of 4

OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:00 am
by STREETCAT
Ok, I didn’t know where to post this, but I know where it will head, so....

Ok he took his oath to office Tuesday, on the same bible ABRAHAM LINCOLN used.

Yesterday he re-did his entire oath. Why was this oath not performed on a bible?

"".... Some guy forgot to bring it but they went ahead anyway since this was only a 'just-in-case' oath - the White House considers the first one the one that counts. """"

I understand that is not required by the constitution, but with all the speculation about his religion..............

Thoughts???

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:10 am
by whitetrashgriz
STREETCAT wrote:Ok, I didn’t know where to post this, but I know where it will head, so....

Ok he took his oath to office Tuesday, on the same bible ABRAHAM LINCOLN used.

Yesterday he re-did his entire oath. Why was this oath not performed on a bible?

"".... Some guy forgot to bring it but they went ahead anyway since this was only a 'just-in-case' oath - the White House considers the first one the one that counts. """"

I understand that is not required by the constitution, but with all the speculation about his religion..............

Thoughts???
my thoughts are this is going to be the first of probably hundreds of insignificant happenings of our president that people, and the media, are going to try to make into issues. and while i think it's stupid, (especially since all the talk about his possible religion is from the media) it comes with the territory.

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:17 am
by D-Wreck
whitetrashgriz wrote:
STREETCAT wrote:Ok, I didn’t know where to post this, but I know where it will head, so....

Ok he took his oath to office Tuesday, on the same bible ABRAHAM LINCOLN used.

Yesterday he re-did his entire oath. Why was this oath not performed on a bible?

"".... Some guy forgot to bring it but they went ahead anyway since this was only a 'just-in-case' oath - the White House considers the first one the one that counts. """"

I understand that is not required by the constitution, but with all the speculation about his religion..............

Thoughts???
my thoughts are this is going to be the first of probably hundreds of insignificant happenings of our president that people, and the media, are going to try to make into issues. and while i think it's stupid, (especially since all the talk about his possible religion is from the media) it comes with the territory.
:goodpost:

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:56 am
by longhorn_22
So why in the hell would you redo the oath in the first place?

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:59 am
by RMD
longhorn_22 wrote:So why in the hell would you redo the oath in the first place?
from what I have heard it is because they messed it up so bad the first time.

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:10 am
by MashTun
RMD wrote:
longhorn_22 wrote:So why in the hell would you redo the oath in the first place?
from what I have heard it is because they messed it up so bad the first time.

Justice Roberts flipped a couple phrases around in the inauguration. Obama repeated what Roberts said, although you could see he knew it wasn't correct. No big deal. They re-did the next day correctly so there where no questions.

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:15 am
by whitetrashgriz
longhorn_22 wrote:So why in the hell would you redo the oath in the first place?
well seeing as a president doesn't have to do it to begin with, i think obama did it for the exact reason we are talking about. people are actually calling out his religion, and many times his status as an american. can you imagine the uproar if he refused to do it correctly? i think it's a non-issue, and would have been whether he re-did it or not, but you can imagine the hay-day people would have with him if he didn't redo it.

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:19 am
by Grizlaw
RMD wrote:
longhorn_22 wrote:So why in the hell would you redo the oath in the first place?
from what I have heard it is because they messed it up so bad the first time.
Yeah...Roberts misplaced the word "faithfully," and Obama tried to prompt him to fix it. After that, they were both flustered, and it ended up garbled. Not a huge deal, but he re-took the oath to prevent some tinfoil hat-wearing crackpot from suing him six years from now, claiming that his presidency was unconstitutional because he was never properly sworn in.

I had never heard of this before, but apparently, other presidents have re-taken the oath under similar circumstances in the past.

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 11:59 am
by catatonic1
I think he re-did it, like he re-did his birth certificate

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:16 pm
by TIrwin24
catatonic1 wrote:I think he re-did it, like he re-did his birth certificate
I bet your mom wishes she could go back and re-do her decision on having you.

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 1:38 pm
by D-Wreck
TIrwin24 wrote:
catatonic1 wrote:I think he re-did it, like he re-did his birth certificate
I bet your mom wishes she could go back and re-do her decision on having you.
:hot: ( i know it's supposed to be an angry smiley. I'm using it for BURN!)

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 2:49 pm
by CapitalCityCat
it's all a conspiracy. Obama secretly met with Justice Roberts before the swearing-in and told him to "intentionally mess it up" so it would APPEAR that Obama knew that Roberts screwed up, and thereby require Obama to retake the oath (sans Bible) after people questioned whether the swearing-in was legal and after people questioned if Obama was really sworn-in as the President since the oath was flubbed. Since the original oath on Lincoln's Bible was not "valid", and the second oath was not taken on a Bible, he surely must not be a Christian.... Obama really is a Muslim and is holding secret meetings with Al-Qaeda terrorists as we speak. I'm sure that's the version on the Limbaugh show anyways..... :roll:

TIrwin24 wrote:
catatonic1 wrote:I think he re-did it, like he re-did his birth certificate
I bet your mom wishes she could go back and re-do her decision on having you.
=D^

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:00 pm
by SonomaCat
CapitalCityCat wrote:it's all a conspiracy. Obama secretly met with Justice Roberts before the swearing-in and told him to "intentionally mess it up" so it would APPEAR that Obama knew that Roberts screwed up, and thereby require Obama to retake the oath (sans Bible) after people questioned whether the swearing-in was legal and after people questioned if Obama was really sworn-in as the President since the oath was flubbed. Since the original oath on Lincoln's Bible was not "valid", and the second oath was not taken on a Bible, he surely must not be a Christian.... Obama really is a Muslim and is holding secret meetings with Al-Qaeda terrorists as we speak. I'm sure that's the version on the Limbaugh show anyways..... :roll:
That ... was ... AWEsome!

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:07 pm
by BDizzle
CapitalCityCat wrote:it's all a conspiracy. Obama secretly met with Justice Roberts before the swearing-in and told him to "intentionally mess it up" so it would APPEAR that Obama knew that Roberts screwed up, and thereby require Obama to retake the oath (sans Bible) after people questioned whether the swearing-in was legal and after people questioned if Obama was really sworn-in as the President since the oath was flubbed. Since the original oath on Lincoln's Bible was not "valid", and the second oath was not taken on a Bible, he surely must not be a Christian.... Obama really is a Muslim and is holding secret meetings with Al-Qaeda terrorists as we speak. I'm sure that's the version on the Limbaugh show anyways..... :roll:

TIrwin24 wrote:
catatonic1 wrote:I think he re-did it, like he re-did his birth certificate
I bet your mom wishes she could go back and re-do her decision on having you.
=D^
Actually I think Bush met with Roberts and told him to mess it up so some Republicans could come in later and say Obama wasn't President since he didn't do the oath right.

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:29 pm
by Griznationalist
I never thought I'd hear anyone as eloquent as Bush, until Roberts opened his mouth.

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:58 am
by Willie06
The only thing I got against the guy is...WHY THE FVCK IS HE CLOSING GUANTANAMO BAY? Where the hell does he plan to hold all these prisoners now?

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:45 am
by AlphaGriz1
In his ego?

Plenty of room.

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:39 am
by Billings_Griz
Willie06 wrote:The only thing I got against the guy is...WHY THE FVCK IS HE CLOSING GUANTANAMO BAY? Where the hell does he plan to hold all these prisoners now?
Put them in the general prison population, things will take care of themselves.


Oh yeah, I forgot, they haven't been "convicted" of anything yet. Kind of like the thousands that died on 9/11. :roll:

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 12:07 pm
by futurebobcat
STREETCAT wrote:Ok, I didn’t know where to post this, but I know where it will head, so....

Ok he took his oath to office Tuesday, on the same bible ABRAHAM LINCOLN used.

Yesterday he re-did his entire oath. Why was this oath not performed on a bible?

"".... Some guy forgot to bring it but they went ahead anyway since this was only a 'just-in-case' oath - the White House considers the first one the one that counts. """"

I understand that is not required by the constitution, but with all the speculation about his religion..............

Thoughts???
Well it seems that most are convinced he is Muslim... That is weird HAHA! Either there is a HUGE CONSPIRACY AND HE WILL TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!! or you morons are ignorant and should give the guy a break... I'm guessin alpha is stockin up on his guns and ammo cuz the termination 2nd amendment is on his agenda... am i right?:P

Re: OBAMA

Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:52 pm
by Griznationalist
Can somebody explain to us a single crime that a single prisoner in Gitmo committed?