Pre-game PDFs

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Post Reply
User avatar
CelticCat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 12362
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:55 pm
Location: Upper Northwest WA
Contact:

Pre-game PDFs

Post by CelticCat » Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:47 pm

Does anyone else look at the PDF pregame guides that are put out on www.msubobcatscom ? They are pretty cool if you haven't.

http://www.msubobcats.com/upload/pdf1_2 ... 622433.pdf


R&R Cat Cast - the #1 Bobcat fan podcast - https://www.rrcatcast.com
Twitter - https://twitter.com/rrcatcast

User avatar
GavinDonos
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1826
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Billings

Re: Pre-game PDFs

Post by GavinDonos » Wed Sep 14, 2005 8:56 pm

CelticCat wrote:Does anyone else look at the PDF pregame guides that are put out on www.msubobcatscom ? They are pretty cool if you haven't.

http://www.msubobcats.com/upload/pdf1_2 ... 622433.pdf
They're cool, but have some pretty glaring errors in them... It's hard to tell if all the info is reliable or not sometimes. I notice the stats from the OK State game are actually the stats from last years Adams State game, hehe. I like that result better. :wink:



2Cats
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 109
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 4:41 pm

Question

Post by 2Cats » Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:21 am

CC

Where did you go on msubobcat to find the pdf?



User avatar
CelticCat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 12362
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:55 pm
Location: Upper Northwest WA
Contact:

Post by CelticCat » Thu Sep 15, 2005 7:24 am

At http://www.msubobcats.com/ , it is always under the "Bobcat Gamenotes" article. Click on the article about Cal Poly, and at the very top you will see a "PDF Version Available" underneath the date and what not. They have it for all games, but it is easy to miss the little PDF link.


R&R Cat Cast - the #1 Bobcat fan podcast - https://www.rrcatcast.com
Twitter - https://twitter.com/rrcatcast

User avatar
grizzh8r
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7516
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:23 pm
Location: Billings via Livingston

Post by grizzh8r » Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:02 pm

:shock: Cal Poly's OL AVERAGES 6'5", 320 lbs!

DL averages 6'3.5", 280 lbs

MSU OL avarages 6'3", 265 lbs, DL averages 6'3" 285 lbs

I am really worried about this game now that i have seen this. They are bigger than us on BOTH sides of the football. Even their receivers are significantly taller than ours (6'3" - 205 lbs)......


Eric Curry STILL makes me sad.
94VegasCat wrote:Are you for real? That is just a plain ol dumb paragraph! You just nailed every note in the Full grizidiot - yep , that includes you GRIZFNZ - sing-a-long choir!!!
:rofl:

suckitgriz
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 454
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 8:35 am

Post by suckitgriz » Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:04 pm

Cal Poly's OL AVERAGES 6'5", 320 lbs!

DL averages 6'3.5", 280 lbs

MSU OL avarages 6'3", 265 lbs, DL averages 6'3" 285 lbs

I am really worried about this game now that i have seen this. They are bigger than us on BOTH sides of the football. Even their receivers are significantly taller than ours (6'3" - 205 lbs)......


Speed kills!
Last edited by suckitgriz on Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Image

User avatar
kmax
Site Admin
Posts: 9841
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Belgrade, MT
Contact:

Post by kmax » Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:12 pm

grizzh8r wrote::shock: Cal Poly's OL AVERAGES 6'5", 320 lbs!

DL averages 6'3.5", 280 lbs

MSU OL avarages 6'3", 265 lbs, DL averages 6'3" 285 lbs

I am really worried about this game now that i have seen this. They are bigger than us on BOTH sides of the football. Even their receivers are significantly taller than ours (6'3" - 205 lbs)......
SFA's OLine was huge as well and had me a bit scared. That is until I saw that all of the weight their OLine had on them was hanging over their belts. Just a weight figure means very little, how athletic are they with all that size is more important.


“Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be—or to be indistinguishable from—self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.” -- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon

User avatar
SonomaCat
Moderator
Posts: 24028
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Contact:

Post by SonomaCat » Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:22 pm

Our Oline averages well over 265 (unless they are including a couple tight ends), as well. I'm not sure if that was a typo here or in the pdf -- I seem to remember noticing it in the pdf when I looked through it, though.

I also tend to notice quite a few errors in there when I peruse it, so I'm constantly second-guessing a lot of things to make sure they make sense.



User avatar
BobcatLionFan
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: Sunny area of the world

Post by BobcatLionFan » Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:29 pm

suckitgriz wrote:Cal Poly's OL AVERAGES 6'5", 320 lbs!

DL averages 6'3.5", 280 lbs

MSU OL avarages 6'3", 265 lbs, DL averages 6'3" 285 lbs

I am really worried about this game now that i have seen this. They are bigger than us on BOTH sides of the football. Even their receivers are significantly taller than ours (6'3" - 205 lbs)......
I agree with Kmax, SFA had a BIG OL and it meant nothing. But Cal Poly does like to run the ball.

On our OL being 6'3 265lbs. I think that is wrong. If you add up

RT Hirst 292
RG Fig 276
C Brent 271
LG Bolton 302
LT Jensen 277

It's hard to average 265 when all are above that. A better number is 284 (about 20 pounds heavier).

The 6'3" part is probably true because we have two munchkins in Fig and Brent bringing the height down. Where you need the height at Tackles (with long arms) we are fine.

The only guy I'm worried about on Cal Poly is the DE Chris Cogony? He sounds like a load for anyone (probably an NFL draft pick guy). But having an Atheltic OL will help against him because he will have speed. A slow footed Tackle against him would be a problem. Hirst and Jensen will be fine (possibly not stop him totally) but fine.


Save the earth. It's the only planet with chocolate.

User avatar
GavinDonos
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1826
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:35 pm
Location: Billings

Post by GavinDonos » Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:51 pm

I'm telling you guys... those things are fun to look at but hard to trust. It's the same story with the basketball PDFs. They must really be understaffed.

Those weight averages could be the numbers from a game that happened in 2001 for all we know.

I always hate being critical when people are busting thier asses, but there are some pretty major errors every week in those PDFs. Do not consider the info in them as 100% up-to-date.



User avatar
BobcatLionFan
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1084
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 2:19 pm
Location: Sunny area of the world

Post by BobcatLionFan » Thu Sep 15, 2005 12:57 pm

Maybe it is a nefarious plot to provide misinformation to opposing teams and players? This could be a major stratagem by the intercircle of MSU that we have uncovered!! 8) :roll: :roll:


With where the 265 came from, back in 2001 Hirst and Jensen were probably 210 pounds and Birkeland was 200. Bolton and Fig were probably 302 and 280. Bolton was probably 302 when he was born.


Save the earth. It's the only planet with chocolate.

Post Reply