How do Cats stack up against Griz

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Post Reply
Prodigal Cat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2487
Joined: Thu Nov 06, 2014 9:50 am

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by Prodigal Cat » Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:31 pm

HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:19 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:52 am
OldGriz wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:20 pm
NewEra wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:15 pm
ClowderUp wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 6:18 pm
The gris have never seen an offense like the Cats.

Or a defense FTG
The offense that hung 17 points on Mercyhurst.
Yep. Also same MSU team that beat EWU 57-3 yet the Pandas won by 5.
Well if you’re going to play the card that the loss at home to SDSU wasn’t all that bad because they had their QB Mason available and are much better with him ….then you have to also 100% accept the fact that the freshman EWU QB the Griz faced (and the Cats didn’t) is also a huge difference maker for their team. That kid went 31-41 for 299 and 2 TDs today in their win.
Griz also made Jordan Cooke look all conference. And Cordell Williams. And. And. And.
Griz have a habit of coming out of games saying X player on the other team is soooo awesome.


Brewer/Owner Copper Furrow Brewing

91catAlum
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10322
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:41 pm
Location: Clancy, MT

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by 91catAlum » Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:33 pm

HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:19 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:52 am
OldGriz wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:20 pm
NewEra wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:15 pm
ClowderUp wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 6:18 pm
The gris have never seen an offense like the Cats.

Or a defense FTG
The offense that hung 17 points on Mercyhurst.
Yep. Also same MSU team that beat EWU 57-3 yet the Pandas won by 5.
Well if you’re going to play the card that the loss at home to SDSU wasn’t all that bad because they had their QB Mason available and are much better with him ….then you have to also 100% accept the fact that the freshman EWU QB the Griz faced (and the Cats didn’t) is also a huge difference maker for their team. That kid went 31-41 for 299 and 2 TDs today in their win.
Sdsu is missing a lot more than just Mason. But still just insane to me how bad they've fallen off. Never dreamed they might miss the playoffs this year!


Image

Cataholic
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7541
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2014 10:09 pm

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by Cataholic » Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:35 pm

HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:19 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:52 am
OldGriz wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:20 pm
NewEra wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:15 pm
ClowderUp wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 6:18 pm
The gris have never seen an offense like the Cats.

Or a defense FTG
The offense that hung 17 points on Mercyhurst.
Yep. Also same MSU team that beat EWU 57-3 yet the Pandas won by 5.
Well if you’re going to play the card that the loss at home to SDSU wasn’t all that bad because they had their QB Mason available and are much better with him ….then you have to also 100% accept the fact that the freshman EWU QB the Griz faced (and the Cats didn’t) is also a huge difference maker for their team. That kid went 31-41 for 299 and 2 TDs today in their win.
Against Northern Colorado!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: i guess the Gris defense is about as good as Norrhern Colorado!



SparkCat
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1752
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2022 10:18 am

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by SparkCat » Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:38 pm

Cataholic wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:35 pm
HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:19 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:52 am
OldGriz wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:20 pm
NewEra wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:15 pm
ClowderUp wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 6:18 pm
The gris have never seen an offense like the Cats.

Or a defense FTG
The offense that hung 17 points on Mercyhurst.
Yep. Also same MSU team that beat EWU 57-3 yet the Pandas won by 5.
Well if you’re going to play the card that the loss at home to SDSU wasn’t all that bad because they had their QB Mason available and are much better with him ….then you have to also 100% accept the fact that the freshman EWU QB the Griz faced (and the Cats didn’t) is also a huge difference maker for their team. That kid went 31-41 for 299 and 2 TDs today in their win.
Against Northern Colorado!! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: i guess the Gris defense is about as good as Norrhern Colorado!
lol with this comparison, Northern Colorado actually has a stouter defense than the Griz



OldGriz
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 269
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2023 2:22 pm

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by OldGriz » Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:27 pm

The whole “point differential with common opponents” thing is as reliable as the flip of a coin for predictive purposes. But I still can’t believe SDSU beat the Cats. SDSU lost to a team (Indiana State) in Brookings who Montana clobbered 63-20.



onceacat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4189
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:35 pm

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by onceacat » Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:39 pm

OldGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:27 pm
The whole “point differential with common opponents” thing is as reliable as the flip of a coin for predictive purposes. But I still can’t believe SDSU beat the Cats. SDSU lost to a team (Indiana State) in Brookings who Montana clobbered 63-20.
Cats are 20 point favorites against a top 10 team. Pandas were a 30 point favorite against a team with one win.

Vegas apparently saw something in that SDSU game that you haven't been able to see.



HookedOnGriz
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:50 pm

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by HookedOnGriz » Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:52 pm

Prodigal Cat wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:31 pm
HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:19 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:52 am
OldGriz wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:20 pm
NewEra wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:15 pm
ClowderUp wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 6:18 pm
The gris have never seen an offense like the Cats.

Or a defense FTG
The offense that hung 17 points on Mercyhurst.
Yep. Also same MSU team that beat EWU 57-3 yet the Pandas won by 5.
Well if you’re going to play the card that the loss at home to SDSU wasn’t all that bad because they had their QB Mason available and are much better with him ….then you have to also 100% accept the fact that the freshman EWU QB the Griz faced (and the Cats didn’t) is also a huge difference maker for their team. That kid went 31-41 for 299 and 2 TDs today in their win.
Griz also made Jordan Cooke look all conference. And Cordell Williams. And. And. And.
Griz have a habit of coming out of games saying X player on the other team is soooo awesome.
Oh the Griz certainly have a tendency to make all the QBs look pretty good….except for PSU who threw 5 picks to the wrong team. :)



profisme
Member # Retired
Posts: 2401
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 8:05 pm
Location: Bozeman, MT
Contact:

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by profisme » Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:57 pm

HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:52 pm
Prodigal Cat wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:31 pm
HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:19 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:52 am
OldGriz wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:20 pm
NewEra wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:15 pm
ClowderUp wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 6:18 pm
The gris have never seen an offense like the Cats.

Or a defense FTG
The offense that hung 17 points on Mercyhurst.
Yep. Also same MSU team that beat EWU 57-3 yet the Pandas won by 5.
Well if you’re going to play the card that the loss at home to SDSU wasn’t all that bad because they had their QB Mason available and are much better with him ….then you have to also 100% accept the fact that the freshman EWU QB the Griz faced (and the Cats didn’t) is also a huge difference maker for their team. That kid went 31-41 for 299 and 2 TDs today in their win.
Griz also made Jordan Cooke look all conference. And Cordell Williams. And. And. And.
Griz have a habit of coming out of games saying X player on the other team is soooo awesome.
Oh the Griz certainly have a tendency to make all the QBs look pretty good….except for PSU who threw 5 picks to the wrong team. :)
Makes me wonder how one throws 5 picks to the right team.

PSU’s QB was bad.



User avatar
Montanabob
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4572
Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 8:29 pm
Location: Two Dot

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by Montanabob » Sat Nov 15, 2025 9:25 pm

psu just wanted to make robbie look good for daddie so they can trade him for 6 transfers.

after that, they wanted to go home early.


MSU fan.... U of I Graduate... They're Back

BobcatBuiltTexan
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2023 11:25 am

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by BobcatBuiltTexan » Sat Nov 15, 2025 9:29 pm

OldGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:27 pm
The whole “point differential with common opponents” thing is as reliable as the flip of a coin for predictive purposes. But I still can’t believe SDSU beat the Cats. SDSU lost to a team (Indiana State) in Brookings who Montana clobbered 63-20.
I posted an actual assessment of the griz... no numbers eye ball test.... let's talk football x' and o's...... what does the griz do better than msu? I'll go position by position... and which one is better... let's throw out numbers and let's talk scheme and players.....

Qb: ah Yat doesn't have a strong arm. On go balls under throws Wortham routinely. He is mobile and he makes good decisions. He's pretty accurate, can hit open guys in the chest but when it comes to threading the needle i don't see that kind of accuracy. Don't see down field touch either. Lamson is way more accurate, can thread the needle, had down field touch and had a bigger arm. Mobility I feel it's less than ah yat, but what he lacks in our mobility he makes up with in our grit......QB goes to MSU

RB: Gillan has a great frame. Doesn't have a lot of wiggle. Straight line speed is fairly avg but heel out run a lot of people. Runs hard. That's what makes him scary, every run is like his first run of the game, physical. Um had no real back up that is comparable to gillman. Msu has a two headed monster. Julius is having a better year in my eyes. Equally as physical as Gillman smaller frame. Neither have wiggle, speed is about the same for both players. Jones is the fastest of this group, also no real wiggle and is a touch less physical than the other two. What he lacks in physicality he makes up in pass catching and open space ability. We have two top notch ebs um has one....RB goes to msu

Ol: while msu ol hasn't been as great as previous years is better than um by a large margin. Um's ol didn't handle blocking lbs as the scrape well. There was no change in the los in run plays and in pass pro they got the back out quickly, whether fade ball or short routes, because they didn't handle the dl all that great. Msu hasn't been great in the run game but for whatever reason they are really doing stellar in the pass blocking game. They also for whatever reason when they HAVE to run the ball are able to.....OL goes to msu

Wr: um has worthman that's it. The rest are relatively slow acd create little to no separation. They rely on router Covid to get open and Wortham relies on being better than who's across from. If he isn't faster than then he's rendered ineffective. None run great routes, they get the ball out quickly based on coverage. Msu has taco, king, and woods. Taco comparatively is better than Wortham. Catches the ball cleaner, runs better routes, maybe a touch slower. King and woods are better than any other um wr. Both are faster, run better routes and are now able to create separation.....WR goes to msu

TE: There literally is no comparison at all. Every te we have is better than any te on the um roster... period the end.

Cb: again no comparison AT ALL. Your fastest cb isn't faster than our slowest cb. Tech is better. Aggressiveness is stronger. Ability to play zone AND man is far better than um.

S: again no comparison. There is no body on your roster the caliber of Dowler. Our safeties fill better and cover better, more athletic as well.

Dl: this is a lot closer than any other position. Um has nice DEs. Extremely fast. They only speed rush though. I do like that um plays have up front...twists, slants, drop des from time to time. Without the blitz though they get literally nothing from the inside, it's all de rush. Dts don't pass rush well but in the run game they eat up guard to guard almost like they are two gapping. Msu I think isn't as God given Tashkent wise better but they seen too play better as a unit. They get pass rush from literally anyone and everyone. They all pin their ears and play gap sound ootball. They transition from run reading to pass rush very well, this makes them a little slow to the pass rush but the dbsc cover so well it doesn't matter.....DL is a push

Lbs: another close unit comparison. Ums lbs are aggressive by play call. They play very deep off the line which allows them time to read and react. When they see it they really do trigger but they are terrible in pass coverage. They can't close the holes in the zone at all. They rely on blitzing to create negative plays or throw into coverage. Playing base they are very underwhelming. Msu's lbs play cost to the line and react quicker sideline to sideline and north and south. They aren't great in suffrage but their dbs are so good they don't need to be. They are darn good while playing base. They actually do close holes when in zone. They also create negative plays without having to blitz. Talent alone I think um may be better but actual play on the field msu is better all around....LB goes to msu.

K: neither are awesome. They get the job done. Msu's kicker early on was a concern but recently has been on point.... I'll give it a push.

P: both are adequate. Neither are just stellar... again push

Kr/pr: very close one again. Taco and Wortham are both really good pr's. If either gets a crease its over. Both equally deadly. Kr woods and worrham are equal to each other in my book. Wortham had been doing it longer so he has a better resume but what I've seen recently from woods, he's just as good. This one is a push.

So there isn't one group that umn is ACTUALLY better than based off film. They beat the piss out of bad teams and barely win against good to decent teams. Miss me with the playing back ups, msu does the same and we still kick people in the teeth. Um's record isn't a highlight of their actual team and msu's record isn't a highlight of their team. Msu matches up well acd is the better team in almost every single category. Now it's a rivalry game so all bets are off. Long as msu comes in and doesn't let the cat-griz hooplah get to them they will win going away. It'll be close early then we'll settle down and drag them into deep water and down then like an orca does a polar bear.

So let's see your game film analytical skills....I don't want numbers you tell me what you see in each team's positions and who's better than the other team.



HookedOnGriz
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 263
Joined: Mon Feb 15, 2021 2:50 pm

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by HookedOnGriz » Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:12 pm

BobcatBuiltTexan wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 9:29 pm
OldGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:27 pm
The whole “point differential with common opponents” thing is as reliable as the flip of a coin for predictive purposes. But I still can’t believe SDSU beat the Cats. SDSU lost to a team (Indiana State) in Brookings who Montana clobbered 63-20.
I posted an actual assessment of the griz... no numbers eye ball test.... let's talk football x' and o's...... what does the griz do better than msu? I'll go position by position... and which one is better... let's throw out numbers and let's talk scheme and players.....

Qb: ah Yat doesn't have a strong arm. On go balls under throws Wortham routinely. He is mobile and he makes good decisions. He's pretty accurate, can hit open guys in the chest but when it comes to threading the needle i don't see that kind of accuracy. Don't see down field touch either. Lamson is way more accurate, can thread the needle, had down field touch and had a bigger arm. Mobility I feel it's less than ah yat, but what he lacks in our mobility he makes up with in our grit......QB goes to MSU

RB: Gillan has a great frame. Doesn't have a lot of wiggle. Straight line speed is fairly avg but heel out run a lot of people. Runs hard. That's what makes him scary, every run is like his first run of the game, physical. Um had no real back up that is comparable to gillman. Msu has a two headed monster. Julius is having a better year in my eyes. Equally as physical as Gillman smaller frame. Neither have wiggle, speed is about the same for both players. Jones is the fastest of this group, also no real wiggle and is a touch less physical than the other two. What he lacks in physicality he makes up in pass catching and open space ability. We have two top notch ebs um has one....RB goes to msu

Ol: while msu ol hasn't been as great as previous years is better than um by a large margin. Um's ol didn't handle blocking lbs as the scrape well. There was no change in the los in run plays and in pass pro they got the back out quickly, whether fade ball or short routes, because they didn't handle the dl all that great. Msu hasn't been great in the run game but for whatever reason they are really doing stellar in the pass blocking game. They also for whatever reason when they HAVE to run the ball are able to.....OL goes to msu

Wr: um has worthman that's it. The rest are relatively slow acd create little to no separation. They rely on router Covid to get open and Wortham relies on being better than who's across from. If he isn't faster than then he's rendered ineffective. None run great routes, they get the ball out quickly based on coverage. Msu has taco, king, and woods. Taco comparatively is better than Wortham. Catches the ball cleaner, runs better routes, maybe a touch slower. King and woods are better than any other um wr. Both are faster, run better routes and are now able to create separation.....WR goes to msu

TE: There literally is no comparison at all. Every te we have is better than any te on the um roster... period the end.

Cb: again no comparison AT ALL. Your fastest cb isn't faster than our slowest cb. Tech is better. Aggressiveness is stronger. Ability to play zone AND man is far better than um.

S: again no comparison. There is no body on your roster the caliber of Dowler. Our safeties fill better and cover better, more athletic as well.

Dl: this is a lot closer than any other position. Um has nice DEs. Extremely fast. They only speed rush though. I do like that um plays have up front...twists, slants, drop des from time to time. Without the blitz though they get literally nothing from the inside, it's all de rush. Dts don't pass rush well but in the run game they eat up guard to guard almost like they are two gapping. Msu I think isn't as God given Tashkent wise better but they seen too play better as a unit. They get pass rush from literally anyone and everyone. They all pin their ears and play gap sound ootball. They transition from run reading to pass rush very well, this makes them a little slow to the pass rush but the dbsc cover so well it doesn't matter.....DL is a push

Lbs: another close unit comparison. Ums lbs are aggressive by play call. They play very deep off the line which allows them time to read and react. When they see it they really do trigger but they are terrible in pass coverage. They can't close the holes in the zone at all. They rely on blitzing to create negative plays or throw into coverage. Playing base they are very underwhelming. Msu's lbs play cost to the line and react quicker sideline to sideline and north and south. They aren't great in suffrage but their dbs are so good they don't need to be. They are darn good while playing base. They actually do close holes when in zone. They also create negative plays without having to blitz. Talent alone I think um may be better but actual play on the field msu is better all around....LB goes to msu.

K: neither are awesome. They get the job done. Msu's kicker early on was a concern but recently has been on point.... I'll give it a push.

P: both are adequate. Neither are just stellar... again push

Kr/pr: very close one again. Taco and Wortham are both really good pr's. If either gets a crease its over. Both equally deadly. Kr woods and worrham are equal to each other in my book. Wortham had been doing it longer so he has a better resume but what I've seen recently from woods, he's just as good. This one is a push.

So there isn't one group that umn is ACTUALLY better than based off film. They beat the piss out of bad teams and barely win against good to decent teams. Miss me with the playing back ups, msu does the same and we still kick people in the teeth. Um's record isn't a highlight of their actual team and msu's record isn't a highlight of their team. Msu matches up well acd is the better team in almost every single category. Now it's a rivalry game so all bets are off. Long as msu comes in and doesn't let the cat-griz hooplah get to them they will win going away. It'll be close early then we'll settle down and drag them into deep water and down then like an orca does a polar bear.

So let's see your game film analytical skills....I don't want numbers you tell me what you see in each team's positions and who's better than the other team.
Holy ****** I’ve seen some hot takes but this one takes the cake. This may be the most biased drivel I’ve read. You lost all credibility when you said Ah Yat doesn’t have a strong arm. I guess that’s why there are NFL scouts are a ton of his practices who are wrong then. They literally said his arm strength is one of his biggest attributes. The dude will be on the Payton list and will quite possibly win Big Sky player of the year. The dude has 2800 passing yards which is one of the tops in all of FCS.

Then you double down and say Gillman is just alright. You’ve joined Iaafan in making one of the most idiotic claims over here by stating that. Has 1050 rushing yards and 14 TDs and will be in the running for the Payton award.

Wortham is one of the best players in all of FCS and no one else is all that close. Brooks Davis is up for the Jerry rice award. And now Korbin Hendrix is healthy and has back to back games with TDs, he may be the fastest WR on the Griz. The Griz consistently have 9-11 guys catching passes every single game yet you guys have a better WR corps?

You have better trenches I’ll give you that. Griz however lead FCS in INTs and they sack the QB 2 or 3 times more than Cats.

Both teams are good. Both teams have studs. You don’t have better players in every position group. I didn’t see many cats earn Big Sky player of the week. I saw Griz players make that list 11 weeks in a row.



BobcatBuiltTexan
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2023 11:25 am

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by BobcatBuiltTexan » Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:26 pm

HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:12 pm
BobcatBuiltTexan wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 9:29 pm
OldGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:27 pm
The whole “point differential with common opponents” thing is as reliable as the flip of a coin for predictive purposes. But I still can’t believe SDSU beat the Cats. SDSU lost to a team (Indiana State) in Brookings who Montana clobbered 63-20.
I posted an actual assessment of the griz... no numbers eye ball test.... let's talk football x' and o's...... what does the griz do better than msu? I'll go position by position... and which one is better... let's throw out numbers and let's talk scheme and players.....

Qb: ah Yat doesn't have a strong arm. On go balls under throws Wortham routinely. He is mobile and he makes good decisions. He's pretty accurate, can hit open guys in the chest but when it comes to threading the needle i don't see that kind of accuracy. Don't see down field touch either. Lamson is way more accurate, can thread the needle, had down field touch and had a bigger arm. Mobility I feel it's less than ah yat, but what he lacks in our mobility he makes up with in our grit......QB goes to MSU

RB: Gillan has a great frame. Doesn't have a lot of wiggle. Straight line speed is fairly avg but heel out run a lot of people. Runs hard. That's what makes him scary, every run is like his first run of the game, physical. Um had no real back up that is comparable to gillman. Msu has a two headed monster. Julius is having a better year in my eyes. Equally as physical as Gillman smaller frame. Neither have wiggle, speed is about the same for both players. Jones is the fastest of this group, also no real wiggle and is a touch less physical than the other two. What he lacks in physicality he makes up in pass catching and open space ability. We have two top notch ebs um has one....RB goes to msu

Ol: while msu ol hasn't been as great as previous years is better than um by a large margin. Um's ol didn't handle blocking lbs as the scrape well. There was no change in the los in run plays and in pass pro they got the back out quickly, whether fade ball or short routes, because they didn't handle the dl all that great. Msu hasn't been great in the run game but for whatever reason they are really doing stellar in the pass blocking game. They also for whatever reason when they HAVE to run the ball are able to.....OL goes to msu

Wr: um has worthman that's it. The rest are relatively slow acd create little to no separation. They rely on router Covid to get open and Wortham relies on being better than who's across from. If he isn't faster than then he's rendered ineffective. None run great routes, they get the ball out quickly based on coverage. Msu has taco, king, and woods. Taco comparatively is better than Wortham. Catches the ball cleaner, runs better routes, maybe a touch slower. King and woods are better than any other um wr. Both are faster, run better routes and are now able to create separation.....WR goes to msu

TE: There literally is no comparison at all. Every te we have is better than any te on the um roster... period the end.

Cb: again no comparison AT ALL. Your fastest cb isn't faster than our slowest cb. Tech is better. Aggressiveness is stronger. Ability to play zone AND man is far better than um.

S: again no comparison. There is no body on your roster the caliber of Dowler. Our safeties fill better and cover better, more athletic as well.

Dl: this is a lot closer than any other position. Um has nice DEs. Extremely fast. They only speed rush though. I do like that um plays have up front...twists, slants, drop des from time to time. Without the blitz though they get literally nothing from the inside, it's all de rush. Dts don't pass rush well but in the run game they eat up guard to guard almost like they are two gapping. Msu I think isn't as God given Tashkent wise better but they seen too play better as a unit. They get pass rush from literally anyone and everyone. They all pin their ears and play gap sound ootball. They transition from run reading to pass rush very well, this makes them a little slow to the pass rush but the dbsc cover so well it doesn't matter.....DL is a push

Lbs: another close unit comparison. Ums lbs are aggressive by play call. They play very deep off the line which allows them time to read and react. When they see it they really do trigger but they are terrible in pass coverage. They can't close the holes in the zone at all. They rely on blitzing to create negative plays or throw into coverage. Playing base they are very underwhelming. Msu's lbs play cost to the line and react quicker sideline to sideline and north and south. They aren't great in suffrage but their dbs are so good they don't need to be. They are darn good while playing base. They actually do close holes when in zone. They also create negative plays without having to blitz. Talent alone I think um may be better but actual play on the field msu is better all around....LB goes to msu.

K: neither are awesome. They get the job done. Msu's kicker early on was a concern but recently has been on point.... I'll give it a push.

P: both are adequate. Neither are just stellar... again push

Kr/pr: very close one again. Taco and Wortham are both really good pr's. If either gets a crease its over. Both equally deadly. Kr woods and worrham are equal to each other in my book. Wortham had been doing it longer so he has a better resume but what I've seen recently from woods, he's just as good. This one is a push.

So there isn't one group that umn is ACTUALLY better than based off film. They beat the piss out of bad teams and barely win against good to decent teams. Miss me with the playing back ups, msu does the same and we still kick people in the teeth. Um's record isn't a highlight of their actual team and msu's record isn't a highlight of their team. Msu matches up well acd is the better team in almost every single category. Now it's a rivalry game so all bets are off. Long as msu comes in and doesn't let the cat-griz hooplah get to them they will win going away. It'll be close early then we'll settle down and drag them into deep water and down then like an orca does a polar bear.

So let's see your game film analytical skills....I don't want numbers you tell me what you see in each team's positions and who's better than the other team.
Holy ****** I’ve seen some hot takes but this one takes the cake. This may be the most biased drivel I’ve read. You lost all credibility when you said Ah Yat doesn’t have a strong arm. I guess that’s why there are NFL scouts are a ton of his practices who are wrong then. They literally said his arm strength is one of his biggest attributes. The dude will be on the Payton list and will quite possibly win Big Sky player of the year. The dude has 2800 passing yards which is one of the tops in all of FCS.

Then you double down and say Gillman is just alright. You’ve joined Iaafan in making one of the most idiotic claims over here by stating that. Has 1050 rushing yards and 14 TDs and will be in the running for the Payton award.

Wortham is one of the best players in all of FCS and no one else is all that close. Brooks Davis is up for the Jerry rice award. And now Korbin Hendrix is healthy and has back to back games with TDs, he may be the fastest WR on the Griz. The Griz consistently have 9-11 guys catching passes every single game yet you guys have a better WR corps?

You have better trenches I’ll give you that. Griz however lead FCS in INTs and they sack the QB 2 or 3 times more than Cats.

Both teams are good. Both teams have studs. You don’t have better players in every position group. I didn’t see many cats earn Big Sky player of the week. I saw Griz players make that list 11 weeks in a row.
You've played trash teams you should have good stats. I didn't say gillman was alright I said he was a good as davis. You have NO OTHER RBS he gets all the carries. And again you've played terrible teams. I watched the game dude routinely underthrew Wortham on deep balls. Arm sn't very strong and he isn't very accurate on the deep ball. You have a bunch of catches by wr because of coverage and terrible teams. Wrs aren't fast they were easily covered by psu in man cov. They get open because of route scheme. You have ints because you blitz and qbsv throw into coverage. Sacks.... blitzing... in just regular pass rush not as great. But I did say the des are fast and good.

You have an e qually biased take because based off FILM what I said holds true. All you did was give numbers and opinions. Nothing you said is about actual play and what you see in the course of playing. Support your claims with film breakdown into then.. Duece in ya face means peace see ya later.



BobcatBuiltTexan
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2023 11:25 am

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by BobcatBuiltTexan » Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:33 pm

Oh you sound dumb af to imply I said gillmann is alright when ilitetally compared his style to a HOF rb. A rb I actually played against in college, so I can definitely attest to the style.

Give me your position by position analytical skills based off scheme and ability of each position. I'll wait



onceacat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4189
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:35 pm

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by onceacat » Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:59 pm

BobcatBuiltTexan wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:33 pm
Oh you sound dumb af to imply I said gillmann is alright when ilitetally compared his style to a HOF rb. A rb I actually played against in college, so I can definitely attest to the style.

Give me your position by position analytical skills based off scheme and ability of each position. I'll wait
Gillman is really good, no doubt. But he averages a full yard per carry less than Davis.

Ah Yat is AT BEST the #3 QB in the conference. Hes less accurate & throws more picks than Lamson or Pinnik.

Hes got the same YPA as Lamson & a half yard less than Pinnick.

And thats throwing to an all-universe, NFL Hall of Famer in Wortham.

One would think that if these guys were as good as Hooked says, they'd be leading...or at least right at the top of the statistical leader boards.

Oh, wait. Stats are for losers...you know the Pandas are really good BECAUSE they dont lead any of their categories.

Personally, I think KAH and Lamson are basically a push...maybe a slight nod to Lamson due to his ability to run.



BobcatBuiltTexan
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2023 11:25 am

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by BobcatBuiltTexan » Sat Nov 15, 2025 11:18 pm

onceacat wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:59 pm
BobcatBuiltTexan wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:33 pm
Oh you sound dumb af to imply I said gillmann is alright when ilitetally compared his style to a HOF rb. A rb I actually played against in college, so I can definitely attest to the style.

Give me your position by position analytical skills based off scheme and ability of each position. I'll wait
Gillman is really good, no doubt. But he averages a full yard per carry less than Davis.

Ah Yat is AT BEST the #3 QB in the conference. Hes less accurate & throws more picks than Lamson or Pinnik.

Hes got the same YPA as Lamson & a half yard less than Pinnick.

And thats throwing to an all-universe, NFL Hall of Famer in Wortham.

One would think that if these guys were as good as Hooked says, they'd be leading...or at least right at the top of the statistical leader boards.

Oh, wait. Stats are for losers...you know the Pandas are really good BECAUSE they dont lead any of their categories.

Personally, I think KAH and Lamson are basically a push...maybe a slight nod to Lamson due to his ability to run.
This dude said Wortham is the best player in all of fcs and watched him no be able to separate from a nicklelback all game long in basic man coverage. Ah yat is a good player really good but bsc player of the year puhleeze. Gillman is a really good player, period the end. But we have TWO that are just as good in ability. Your best db wouldn't touch the field at msu. Ability wise lbs from um are better but looking at what they do in base they are less productive. You blitz like um does BECAUSE you can't hold up in a base defense. You have to force the issue because you're lacking in ability.

Again I have an analysis based off film not number comparing. Mcmillan may be the best cb in the conference but his numbers don't jump at you... look at the film and nobody goes at him. Ucd had thrown to his side ONCE and ran routes at him ONCE. Gray doesn't have eye popping stats but again peyote are literally avoiding him all game long. I saw every person on ums defense get targeted, no fear of anyone. Next week will be fun.. we will win..griz is a good team and they're at home, it'll be a tough one... we will win



User avatar
catzz
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 625
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:12 pm
Location: Missoula

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by catzz » Sun Nov 16, 2025 12:24 am

HookedonGRIS clearly didn’t play the game! 😂 Playerrep/oldgriz won’t respond and will say he doesn’t watch the cats. All while giving the play by play on egriz.



bobcatfan123
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 432
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:22 pm

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by bobcatfan123 » Sun Nov 16, 2025 1:31 am

BobcatBuiltTexan wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 11:18 pm
onceacat wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:59 pm
BobcatBuiltTexan wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:33 pm
Oh you sound dumb af to imply I said gillmann is alright when ilitetally compared his style to a HOF rb. A rb I actually played against in college, so I can definitely attest to the style.

Give me your position by position analytical skills based off scheme and ability of each position. I'll wait
Gillman is really good, no doubt. But he averages a full yard per carry less than Davis.

Ah Yat is AT BEST the #3 QB in the conference. Hes less accurate & throws more picks than Lamson or Pinnik.

Hes got the same YPA as Lamson & a half yard less than Pinnick.

And thats throwing to an all-universe, NFL Hall of Famer in Wortham.

One would think that if these guys were as good as Hooked says, they'd be leading...or at least right at the top of the statistical leader boards.

Oh, wait. Stats are for losers...you know the Pandas are really good BECAUSE they dont lead any of their categories.

Personally, I think KAH and Lamson are basically a push...maybe a slight nod to Lamson due to his ability to run.
This dude said Wortham is the best player in all of fcs and watched him no be able to separate from a nicklelback all game long in basic man coverage. Ah yat is a good player really good but bsc player of the year puhleeze. Gillman is a really good player, period the end. But we have TWO that are just as good in ability. Your best db wouldn't touch the field at msu. Ability wise lbs from um are better but looking at what they do in base they are less productive. You blitz like um does BECAUSE you can't hold up in a base defense. You have to force the issue because you're lacking in ability.

Again I have an analysis based off film not number comparing. Mcmillan may be the best cb in the conference but his numbers don't jump at you... look at the film and nobody goes at him. Ucd had thrown to his side ONCE and ran routes at him ONCE. Gray doesn't have eye popping stats but again peyote are literally avoiding him all game long. I saw every person on ums defense get targeted, no fear of anyone. Next week will be fun.. we will win..griz is a good team and they're at home, it'll be a tough one... we will win
Thank you for being a Bobcat. Love hearing your insights. You da man



BobcatBuiltTexan
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 407
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2023 11:25 am

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by BobcatBuiltTexan » Sun Nov 16, 2025 1:40 am

bobcatfan123 wrote:
Sun Nov 16, 2025 1:31 am
BobcatBuiltTexan wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 11:18 pm
onceacat wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:59 pm
BobcatBuiltTexan wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:33 pm
Oh you sound dumb af to imply I said gillmann is alright when ilitetally compared his style to a HOF rb. A rb I actually played against in college, so I can definitely attest to the style.

Give me your position by position analytical skills based off scheme and ability of each position. I'll wait
Gillman is really good, no doubt. But he averages a full yard per carry less than Davis.

Ah Yat is AT BEST the #3 QB in the conference. Hes less accurate & throws more picks than Lamson or Pinnik.

Hes got the same YPA as Lamson & a half yard less than Pinnick.

And thats throwing to an all-universe, NFL Hall of Famer in Wortham.

One would think that if these guys were as good as Hooked says, they'd be leading...or at least right at the top of the statistical leader boards.

Oh, wait. Stats are for losers...you know the Pandas are really good BECAUSE they dont lead any of their categories.

Personally, I think KAH and Lamson are basically a push...maybe a slight nod to Lamson due to his ability to run.
This dude said Wortham is the best player in all of fcs and watched him no be able to separate from a nicklelback all game long in basic man coverage. Ah yat is a good player really good but bsc player of the year puhleeze. Gillman is a really good player, period the end. But we have TWO that are just as good in ability. Your best db wouldn't touch the field at msu. Ability wise lbs from um are better but looking at what they do in base they are less productive. You blitz like um does BECAUSE you can't hold up in a base defense. You have to force the issue because you're lacking in ability.

Again I have an analysis based off film not number comparing. Mcmillan may be the best cb in the conference but his numbers don't jump at you... look at the film and nobody goes at him. Ucd had thrown to his side ONCE and ran routes at him ONCE. Gray doesn't have eye popping stats but again peyote are literally avoiding him all game long. I saw every person on ums defense get targeted, no fear of anyone. Next week will be fun.. we will win..griz is a good team and they're at home, it'll be a tough one... we will win
Thank you for being a Bobcat. Love hearing your insights. You da man
Appreciate it..... this is fun for me. I get bored and these two dudes don't know football, they're just fans talking. I doubt either will actually give a take that isn't just opinions or stats. Gbata had 10rec today, by any measure that's a really good game but if you watch the film he was a non factor today. Numbers lie, men lie, film doesn't



kwcat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3392
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:34 am

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by kwcat » Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:31 am

OldGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:27 pm
The whole “point differential with common opponents” thing is as reliable as the flip of a coin for predictive purposes. But I still can’t believe SDSU beat the Cats. SDSU lost to a team (Indiana State) in Brookings who Montana clobbered 63-20.
I know right! We’re gonna get rolled



Joe Bobcat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3352
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2010 4:43 pm

Re: How do Cats stack up against Griz

Post by Joe Bobcat » Sun Nov 16, 2025 7:46 am

profisme wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:57 pm
HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 8:52 pm
Prodigal Cat wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:31 pm
HookedOnGriz wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 7:19 pm
Cataholic wrote:
Sat Nov 15, 2025 10:52 am
OldGriz wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:20 pm
NewEra wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 7:15 pm
ClowderUp wrote:
Fri Nov 14, 2025 6:18 pm
The gris have never seen an offense like the Cats.

Or a defense FTG
The offense that hung 17 points on Mercyhurst.
Yep. Also same MSU team that beat EWU 57-3 yet the Pandas won by 5.
Well if you’re going to play the card that the loss at home to SDSU wasn’t all that bad because they had their QB Mason available and are much better with him ….then you have to also 100% accept the fact that the freshman EWU QB the Griz faced (and the Cats didn’t) is also a huge difference maker for their team. That kid went 31-41 for 299 and 2 TDs today in their win.
Griz also made Jordan Cooke look all conference. And Cordell Williams. And. And. And.
Griz have a habit of coming out of games saying X player on the other team is soooo awesome.
Oh the Griz certainly have a tendency to make all the QBs look pretty good….except for PSU who threw 5 picks to the wrong team. :)
Makes me wonder how one throws 5 picks to the right team.

PSU’s QB was bad.
Yeah those picks were bad but on the bright side they gave Robbie H the opportunity to get 10 more tackles and who doesn’t like seeing him get accurate credit for tackles made? :lol:


If you're looking for someone with a little authority, I'm your man. I have as little as anyone!

Post Reply