Idaho to contact Kramer

tetoncat · Post by **tetoncat** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:05 pm

Seems to me that they know what they are going to get in Kramer so are spending their first few days contacting others on a short list to guage interest and then still may end up offering to kramer anyways.

bcats · Post by **bcats** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:08 pm

Sounds like it is a done deal. Kramer to Idaho on another thread.

Cat Grad · Post by **Cat Grad** » Mon Dec 11, 2006 2:08 pm

rtb wrote:
Cat Grad wrote:http://collegefootball.rivals.com/conte ... CID=617932

Although I rarely read Rivals, the idea of using a headhunter, if you will, somehow seems a blatant violation of why we have ADs. Anyway, I thought it made for interesting reading.
Not really, the AD doesn't search for candidates that frequently where as a headhunter does that all day, everyday. This is like saying a company with an HR department shouldn't ever use headhunters because that is HR's job. Well, sometimes it is better to go to a specialist who can get you what you need and is trained to do that all day everyday. I think the idea of using a headhunter for coaches is GREAT! In fact if I could have any job in the world that is what I would do.

Yeah, but then we'd miss you and your words of wisdom. See, I'm torn as to what direction (assuming Spear made the move) I'd like to see our football program move. I'd love to see somebody from the past, but on the other hand, I'd like to see then new, improved spread-option such as West Virginia or Ape State, then I'd certainly want to make sure we continue our defense. But, that's why they pay me the big bucks to spout my opinions in here

I will state this: If I hear one time "We need somebody that will be a good fit." I'm definitely going to throw up