MSU already has a $120M-plus endowment, which is nice but it's not huge. But that's where you'd put a perpetual gift, and I'd argue that's not where it's needed the most. Granted, $50M would give that a nice boost, but MSU's endowment is already bigger than UM's (only comparing because it's apples-to-apples, not for competition's sake), so it's not critical. What is critical (if you agree with Cruzado) is building to allow for more students. I don't necessarily disagree, especially when that growth can be supported by adequate resources (facilities, faculty, residences, etc).KeepTheChange wrote:Instead of dumping large chunks into buildings and stuff, the school would be wise to look into a perpetuity. That would be one hell of an infinite stream of cash flows.
Back to endowments though...Montana has done a great job, IMO, with the MT endowment tax credit, which can be applied to any gift given to an endowment. A "normal" gift to a non-profit, which is generally used either for operations or capital projects, only gives the donor a tax deduction. So I think there have been a lot of Montanans that have taken advantage of that and supported the qualifying endowments of non-profits, most notably MSU. Money in an endowment is restricted, and the interest that is spun off can be used for various things. Many organizations are able to support themselves on an annual basis simply because somebody left a fortune to them and their fortune gives them the income they need for operations, then they don't have to hire some idiot like me to raise money or have bake sales and 50/50 drawings at the Lions Club.
Plus, if a donor wants the money used for something specific, it has to be used for that reason. Of course, an organization will usually convince a donor what is needed and make it seem like the donor's idea, but the truth is, Norm wanted it used for buildings and it will be used for buildings. He's a smart guy though. If MSU's endowment was dwindling, he probably would have seen the need and put it there.