Bobcat Nation Forums
http://bobcatnation.com/bobcatbb/
Still wrong. 5 turnovers is not the same as 5 picks.Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 5:56 pmIt was 5 picks, they were off one. They said it seemed like 10!PapaG wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 2:48 pmDid you "hear" this from your well-connected Bobcat friends who saw "at least" 6 interceptions at a practice, which multiple posters here refuted as a lie?Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:41 pmI heard neither were blowing anyone’s minds and both had their moments of struggle, but the coaches think Bauman has more upside potential. That’s from people at every practice. I actually think your coach made the right decision, but there’s going to be a lot of wtf moments on the field as he’s young and still processing. I think the potential is there.
Congratulations to Casey for winning the job!technoCat wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 12:59 pmI'm honestly very surprised. Tucker was by far the best qb in spring. Like it wasn't even close. I really hope that this was a case of Casey improving and not Tucker regressing. That said, I'm glad a decision has been made and we can move forward.VimSince03 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 12:50 pmI have been one of Tucker's biggest supporters on here. I'm very surprised he didn't take this job from Casey...especially after spring ball (where Tucker was clearly better than Casey in my opinion).
Anyway, time to get behind Casey and build around him. He has a howitzer of an arm but now he just needs to learn how to contain it. If he adds more touch to his game, the offense will be in good hands. The biggest positive about Casey? His arm opens up the deep to intermediate passing game more than any QB MSU has put behind center since Prukop.
Rovig as a backup is great for the team as well. We are set now, and let's play some football!Casual is a good word for it. He didn't have to wind up his body or really step that hard into it.VimSince03 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 3:41 pmBlake Thelen to Davine Tullis. Blake throws a pretty deep ball. A casual 60 yard bomb.
Lol. We already heard from those fans “in the know” that were at every practice....Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:41 pmI heard neither were blowing anyone’s minds and both had their moments of struggle, but the coaches think Bauman has more upside potential. That’s from people at every practice. I actually think your coach made the right decision, but there’s going to be a lot of wtf moments on the field as he’s young and still processing. I think the potential is there.BLACKnBLUEnGOLD wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:33 pmI suppose if you think that Rovig is a pretty good player (as I do) or a very good player (as iaafan seems to), the fact that Bauman improved enough to overtake him in such a short time, that's actually more reason to like him than if he had simply beaten out a bad player.Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:24 pmI’m surprised you’re so positive here. You seemed to be Tucker’s biggest advocate here, telling all of us how SDSU shouldn’t come into play against Rovig and posting stat after stat after stat in support of why Rovig is so much better than anyone realizes. I said a long time ago Rovig isn’t your guy even though the coaching staff really wanted him to be. The job was all his to lose and he lost it, again. But it’s funny how supportive you are of this decision after all the Rovig rah rah you’ve given here.
Rolo was around 6'3 230 I think.TomCat88 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:03 pmOne thing is for certain. Bauman brings an entirely different skill set than anyone I've seen at MSU. I don't recall having anyone this big AND with such a strong arm AND fairly mobile. Kelly Bradley was pretty big, about 6-4, 225 or so. Rolovich had a very strong arm, but not realy big. Neither were mobile. Bauman moves pretty well.
6-2, 224 at his Pro Day. Not really big for a QB. About average height and a lot of that 224 was in his trunk. Not mobile.bobcat99 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:41 pmRolo was around 6'3 230 I think.TomCat88 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 10:03 pmOne thing is for certain. Bauman brings an entirely different skill set than anyone I've seen at MSU. I don't recall having anyone this big AND with such a strong arm AND fairly mobile. Kelly Bradley was pretty big, about 6-4, 225 or so. Rolovich had a very strong arm, but not realy big. Neither were mobile. Bauman moves pretty well.
He wasn't Bauman sized, but he wasn't small either.
*Beaverhead County Highiaafan wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2019 8:52 amBauman is from a small town and school in Washington, but the school enrollment would be in the middle of Class A in Montana. It’s bigger than Beaverhead High in Dillon. Relative to Montana it’s a B school, but they played against schools that have A enrollment in Montana.
Cute. When everyone was going on and on here about Rovig, I said a long time ago he isn’t the guy. I was asking people here when Bauman was going to be named starter. This wasn’t surprising.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 9:56 pmLol. We already heard from those fans “in the know” that were at every practice....Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:41 pmI heard neither were blowing anyone’s minds and both had their moments of struggle, but the coaches think Bauman has more upside potential. That’s from people at every practice. I actually think your coach made the right decision, but there’s going to be a lot of wtf moments on the field as he’s young and still processing. I think the potential is there.BLACKnBLUEnGOLD wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:33 pmI suppose if you think that Rovig is a pretty good player (as I do) or a very good player (as iaafan seems to), the fact that Bauman improved enough to overtake him in such a short time, that's actually more reason to like him than if he had simply beaten out a bad player.Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:24 pmI’m surprised you’re so positive here. You seemed to be Tucker’s biggest advocate here, telling all of us how SDSU shouldn’t come into play against Rovig and posting stat after stat after stat in support of why Rovig is so much better than anyone realizes. I said a long time ago Rovig isn’t your guy even though the coaching staff really wanted him to be. The job was all his to lose and he lost it, again. But it’s funny how supportive you are of this decision after all the Rovig rah rah you’ve given here.
You act like it’s shocking that qb’s in fall camp had ups and downs. Do you guys in Missoula not have any guys that have performed well and not so well so far? Bet I could make up some fans who’ve been at every practice and will say not all of your guys look amazing. The act is tired.
I said last week it looked to me that CB was the leader in the clubhouse. But it was more to do with just how he led the team. Both guys had moments of looking great. Both made mistakes. Which I’ll concede never happens in Missoula....
I’m pretty happy where we are. The guy who I thought would lead us is in the spot but I like TR as well. Bottom line is outside noise means nothing. The cards will fall where they may. But this Cat will support whoever is leading us and won’t get caught up in meaningless griz trash talk. Like they have nothing to worry about...
GA is a 12 year oldGrizaddict wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2019 9:00 amCute. When everyone was going on and on here about Rovig, I said a long time ago he isn’t the guy. I was asking people here when Bauman was going to be named starter. This wasn’t surprising.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 9:56 pmLol. We already heard from those fans “in the know” that were at every practice....Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:41 pmI heard neither were blowing anyone’s minds and both had their moments of struggle, but the coaches think Bauman has more upside potential. That’s from people at every practice. I actually think your coach made the right decision, but there’s going to be a lot of wtf moments on the field as he’s young and still processing. I think the potential is there.BLACKnBLUEnGOLD wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:33 pmI suppose if you think that Rovig is a pretty good player (as I do) or a very good player (as iaafan seems to), the fact that Bauman improved enough to overtake him in such a short time, that's actually more reason to like him than if he had simply beaten out a bad player.Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:24 pmI’m surprised you’re so positive here. You seemed to be Tucker’s biggest advocate here, telling all of us how SDSU shouldn’t come into play against Rovig and posting stat after stat after stat in support of why Rovig is so much better than anyone realizes. I said a long time ago Rovig isn’t your guy even though the coaching staff really wanted him to be. The job was all his to lose and he lost it, again. But it’s funny how supportive you are of this decision after all the Rovig rah rah you’ve given here.
You act like it’s shocking that qb’s in fall camp had ups and downs. Do you guys in Missoula not have any guys that have performed well and not so well so far? Bet I could make up some fans who’ve been at every practice and will say not all of your guys look amazing. The act is tired.
I said last week it looked to me that CB was the leader in the clubhouse. But it was more to do with just how he led the team. Both guys had moments of looking great. Both made mistakes. Which I’ll concede never happens in Missoula....
I’m pretty happy where we are. The guy who I thought would lead us is in the spot but I like TR as well. Bottom line is outside noise means nothing. The cards will fall where they may. But this Cat will support whoever is leading us and won’t get caught up in meaningless griz trash talk. Like they have nothing to worry about...
I just checked, it was August 4 on the fourth day of camp when I posted Rovig is not your quarterback. Looks like I was right again. Imagine that
On that note.... How do you ignore a poster??Cataholic wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2019 9:17 amGA is a 12 year oldGrizaddict wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2019 9:00 amCute. When everyone was going on and on here about Rovig, I said a long time ago he isn’t the guy. I was asking people here when Bauman was going to be named starter. This wasn’t surprising.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 9:56 pmLol. We already heard from those fans “in the know” that were at every practice....Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:41 pmI heard neither were blowing anyone’s minds and both had their moments of struggle, but the coaches think Bauman has more upside potential. That’s from people at every practice. I actually think your coach made the right decision, but there’s going to be a lot of wtf moments on the field as he’s young and still processing. I think the potential is there.BLACKnBLUEnGOLD wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:33 pmI suppose if you think that Rovig is a pretty good player (as I do) or a very good player (as iaafan seems to), the fact that Bauman improved enough to overtake him in such a short time, that's actually more reason to like him than if he had simply beaten out a bad player.Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:24 pmI’m surprised you’re so positive here. You seemed to be Tucker’s biggest advocate here, telling all of us how SDSU shouldn’t come into play against Rovig and posting stat after stat after stat in support of why Rovig is so much better than anyone realizes. I said a long time ago Rovig isn’t your guy even though the coaching staff really wanted him to be. The job was all his to lose and he lost it, again. But it’s funny how supportive you are of this decision after all the Rovig rah rah you’ve given here.
You act like it’s shocking that qb’s in fall camp had ups and downs. Do you guys in Missoula not have any guys that have performed well and not so well so far? Bet I could make up some fans who’ve been at every practice and will say not all of your guys look amazing. The act is tired.
I said last week it looked to me that CB was the leader in the clubhouse. But it was more to do with just how he led the team. Both guys had moments of looking great. Both made mistakes. Which I’ll concede never happens in Missoula....
I’m pretty happy where we are. The guy who I thought would lead us is in the spot but I like TR as well. Bottom line is outside noise means nothing. The cards will fall where they may. But this Cat will support whoever is leading us and won’t get caught up in meaningless griz trash talk. Like they have nothing to worry about...
I just checked, it was August 4 on the fourth day of camp when I posted Rovig is not your quarterback. Looks like I was right again. Imagine that
An artist's rendering of the day GA loses 150 pounds and could afford this apparatus:Grizaddict wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2019 9:00 amCute. When everyone was going on and on here about Rovig, I said a long time ago he isn’t the guy. I was asking people here when Bauman was going to be named starter. This wasn’t surprising.ilovethecats wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 9:56 pmLol. We already heard from those fans “in the know” that were at every practice....Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:41 pmI heard neither were blowing anyone’s minds and both had their moments of struggle, but the coaches think Bauman has more upside potential. That’s from people at every practice. I actually think your coach made the right decision, but there’s going to be a lot of wtf moments on the field as he’s young and still processing. I think the potential is there.BLACKnBLUEnGOLD wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:33 pmI suppose if you think that Rovig is a pretty good player (as I do) or a very good player (as iaafan seems to), the fact that Bauman improved enough to overtake him in such a short time, that's actually more reason to like him than if he had simply beaten out a bad player.Grizaddict wrote: ↑Mon Aug 12, 2019 1:24 pmI’m surprised you’re so positive here. You seemed to be Tucker’s biggest advocate here, telling all of us how SDSU shouldn’t come into play against Rovig and posting stat after stat after stat in support of why Rovig is so much better than anyone realizes. I said a long time ago Rovig isn’t your guy even though the coaching staff really wanted him to be. The job was all his to lose and he lost it, again. But it’s funny how supportive you are of this decision after all the Rovig rah rah you’ve given here.
You act like it’s shocking that qb’s in fall camp had ups and downs. Do you guys in Missoula not have any guys that have performed well and not so well so far? Bet I could make up some fans who’ve been at every practice and will say not all of your guys look amazing. The act is tired.
I said last week it looked to me that CB was the leader in the clubhouse. But it was more to do with just how he led the team. Both guys had moments of looking great. Both made mistakes. Which I’ll concede never happens in Missoula....
I’m pretty happy where we are. The guy who I thought would lead us is in the spot but I like TR as well. Bottom line is outside noise means nothing. The cards will fall where they may. But this Cat will support whoever is leading us and won’t get caught up in meaningless griz trash talk. Like they have nothing to worry about...
I just checked, it was August 4 on the fourth day of camp when I posted Rovig is not your quarterback. Looks like I was right again. Imagine that
GA is slipping on his duties over on efizz. He use to tell all the new recruits to “prepare to win championships.” I wonder why he doesn’t do that anymore?Grizaddict wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2019 9:47 amIt’s just so hard being right here all the time. Here’s your next one, Rovig is already looking to transfer out. Like I said, TA back at QB in no time.
I need some Aloe, that was a hot take!Grizaddict wrote: ↑Tue Aug 13, 2019 9:47 amIt’s just so hard being right here all the time. Here’s your next one, Rovig is already looking to transfer out. Like I said, TA back at QB in no time.