Page 1 of 1

Hero Sports Top FCS Recruiting Classes

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:49 pm
by CelticCat
https://herosports.com/fcs/football-201 ... kings-ajaj

Using their recruiting evaluation methodology, this is where the Cats ended up:

40 Montana State BIG SKY

That would put us 5th in the conference. This does not include transfers.

Re: Hero Sports Top FCS Recruiting Classes

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 1:07 pm
by RickRund
CelticCat wrote:
Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:49 pm
https://herosports.com/fcs/football-201 ... kings-ajaj

Using their recruiting evaluation methodology, this is where the Cats ended up:

40 Montana State BIG SKY

That would put us 5th in the conference. This does not include transfers.
Wow, NAU and PSU lead the BSC. Surprised there.

Re: Hero Sports Top FCS Recruiting Classes

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 1:50 pm
by mslacatfan
it seems like PSU always gets solid recruiting classes, along with a ton of big transfers/dropdowns...…….. but they never really seem to do anything with it.…...

Re: Hero Sports Top FCS Recruiting Classes

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:22 pm
by Team10
Would like to see the diagrams on how they make their final list. MSU and um will always be slightly removed on where they could a should be due to recruiting so many in-state kids with zero star ratings. Just a couple years ago I would have been slightly mad with the rankings of some individual players as well as the team rating for the recruiting year. Now, I have faith in the coaches and their ability to develop players so they can produce in the future. To hell with the ratings.

Re: Hero Sports Top FCS Recruiting Classes

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:41 pm
by CARDIAC_CATS
The film on a lot of the Cats recruits doesn't lie. There is a lot to be excited for in this Class. Like what was said above. To hell with the ratings.

Re: Hero Sports Top FCS Recruiting Classes

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:52 pm
by Montanabob
Just matters where we are in 4 years with this class.

Re: Hero Sports Top FCS Recruiting Classes

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:39 pm
by catatac
Team10 wrote:
Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:22 pm
Would like to see the diagrams on how they make their final list. MSU and um will always be slightly removed on where they could a should be due to recruiting so many in-state kids with zero star ratings. Just a couple years ago I would have been slightly mad with the rankings of some individual players as well as the team rating for the recruiting year. Now, I have faith in the coaches and their ability to develop players so they can produce in the future. To hell with the ratings.
Didn't MSU have the #1 rated class last year or the year before, minus an Ivy school?

Re: Hero Sports Top FCS Recruiting Classes

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:47 pm
by Team10
catatac wrote:
Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:39 pm
Team10 wrote:
Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:22 pm
Would like to see the diagrams on how they make their final list. MSU and um will always be slightly removed on where they could a should be due to recruiting so many in-state kids with zero star ratings. Just a couple years ago I would have been slightly mad with the rankings of some individual players as well as the team rating for the recruiting year. Now, I have faith in the coaches and their ability to develop players so they can produce in the future. To hell with the ratings.
Didn't MSU have the #1 rated class last year or the year before, minus an Ivy school?
I believe they were listed at #3 and now more than a handful of those recruits are gone, so it means nothing, as nearly all the rankings do. I also believe that ranking included transfers, too. Win and everything else takes care of itself.

Re: Hero Sports Top FCS Recruiting Classes

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 5:16 pm
by catatac
Team10 wrote:
Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:47 pm
catatac wrote:
Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:39 pm
Team10 wrote:
Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:22 pm
Would like to see the diagrams on how they make their final list. MSU and um will always be slightly removed on where they could a should be due to recruiting so many in-state kids with zero star ratings. Just a couple years ago I would have been slightly mad with the rankings of some individual players as well as the team rating for the recruiting year. Now, I have faith in the coaches and their ability to develop players so they can produce in the future. To hell with the ratings.
Didn't MSU have the #1 rated class last year or the year before, minus an Ivy school?
I believe they were listed at #3 and now more than a handful of those recruits are gone, so it means nothing, as nearly all the rankings do. I also believe that ranking included transfers, too. Win and everything else takes care of itself.
Oh totally agree, I was just countering the post that said MSU and UM will always be removed on where they should be considering we ended up with (On paper) one of, or the best recruiting class in FCS by the experts.