wbtfg wrote:geaux_sioux wrote:So how about some Big Sky vs Bridger Bowl discussion. We're planning on hitting the slopes Friday and Saturday, at least that's the plan right now. I have skied many times in Colorado but never in Montana. What are your recommendations and what are the differences between the two? Any input is appreciated! Thanks.
Big sky much more of a resort. Huge skiing lots of acreage, lots of out of staters. Bridger has grown a lot, but has more of a local feel. Will be more crowded than big sky.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That may be, but saying it's crowded to a person who's only ever been to Colorado ski resorts might scare him off.
Sioux, I've skied Bridger since I was 7 or so. I've never once waited in line more than a few minutes. And to have to wait that long is very rare.
As others have said, if you're into the ritzy resort experience (mountain village, dining and shopping) with a mountain you can get lost on, Big Sky is your place. The highway there has been improved, but can still be a gnarly, slick white-knuckler for folks not used to that type of winter driving, and it's an hour plus drive from Bozeman in perfect conditions. Best check the MDT road report map and plan accordingly. May take you upwards of 2 hours to get there and the same coming back.
On the other hand, if you're looking for a mountain with more of a hometown feel, that won't cost you and your wife half a months mortgage for 2 days of skiing, Bridger might be the better choice. It's 30 minutes from Bozeman and an easier drive.
The quality of snow on both mountains is usually very similar and there's more than enough varied terrain at Bridger to hold your interest for 2 days. Both have plenty of vertical if you're experienced skiers. Either way, you won't be bored.
Enjoy your time on the slopes!